Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2006 Oct 31;63(3):10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.006. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.006

Table 1.

Characteristics of research participants

Age Group Age R2


18–39 40–59 60–93 Age Age2 Age3
N 89 132 105
Age 28.3 (6.0) 49.8 (5.4) 70.9 (7.7)
Prop. Females .66 .66 .60 .00 .01 .01
Years of education 15.2 (2.2) 15.8 (2.8) 15.9 (2.7) .02 .02* .00
Health 1.9 (0.8) 2.1 (0.9) 2.3 (1.0) .04* .00 .00
MMSE 29.2 (1.2) 28.9 (1.3) 28.6 (1.8) .03* .00 .03*
Scaled scores
Vocabulary 12.8 (3.1) 12.2 (3.0) 13.6 (2.9) .01 .03* .04*
Digit symbol 11.0 (2.8) 10.7 (2.8) 11.4 (2.7) .01 .00 .01
Cognitive ability scores
Fluid ability (gF) .45 (.81) .03 (.73) −.39 (.71) .22* .00 .03*
Episodic memory .36 (.75) .02 (.74) −.31 (.85) .15* .01 .04*
Perceptual speed .65 (.71) .09 (.70) −.65 (.79) .37* .02* .00
Vocabulary −.33 (.83) .02 (.90) .27 (.83) .06* .01 .04*

Note: Values in parentheses are standard deviations. Health was a rating on a scale from 1 for Excellent to 5 for Poor. MMSE was the score on the mini mental status examination (Folstein et al., 1975) often used as a preliminary screening instrument for dementia. The cognitive ability scores were the average z-scores of six reasoning and spatial visualization measures (Raven’s progressive matrices, Shipley abstraction, letter sets, spatial relations, paper folding, form boards) for fluid ability, three episodic memory measures (logical memory, word recall, paired associates), three perceptual speed measures (digit symbol substitution, letter comparison, pattern comparison), and four vocabulary measures (WAIS III vocabulary, Woodcock–Johnson picture vocabulary, synonym vocabulary, antonym vocabulary). See Salthouse et al., 2006 for further details of the reference cognitive tasks.

*

p < .01.