Table 1.
Cross generating females* | Relevant genotype of females with P{U2af-traF}/+ (mated unless otherwise specified) | Relative viability, %† | Egg-laying parameters‡ |
|||
% laying females§ | No. tested | Eggs laid⋅laying female−1⋅d−1 ± SEM¶ | Maximum no. eggs laid in 1 d|| | |||
A | Sxlf7,M1/ SxlM1,fΔ33 | 73 | 0 | 39 | – | – |
A | Sxlf7,M1/ SxlM1,fΔ33; Dp(Sxl+) | ref (n = 77) | 100 | 23 | 70.4 ± 3.4 | 59–142 |
A | Dp(Sxl+) but not mated | 90 | 30 | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 3–57 | |
B | Sxlf7,M1/ SxlM1,fΔ33; msl-2 | 52 | 4 | 78 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 1–3 |
B | +/Sxlf7,M1; msl-2 | ref (n = 272) | 100 | 34 | 60.6 ± 3.8 | 42–120 |
C | P{SxlΔPm} Sxlf18,f32/Sxl f18,f32 | 93 | 89 | 37 | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 1–56 |
C | P{SxlΔPm} Sxlf18,f32/Sxl f18,f32; Dp(Sxl+) | ref (n = 207) | 100 | 10 | 73.7 ± 5.2 | 68–126 |
C | Dp(Sxl+) but not mated | 100 | 11 | 10.7 ± 2.0 | 1–74 |
Full genotype of crosses: A. y w SxlM1,fΔ33 ct6 sn3/Binsinscy; P{U2af-traF w+mW.hs}2B/+ ☿☿ × ♂♂ w cm Sxlf7,M1 ct6 v/Y; Dp(1;3)sn13a1, cm+Sxl+ct+/+; B. y w SxlM1,fΔ33/Binsinscy; msl-21 P{U2af-traF w+mW.hs}2B/msl-21☿☿ × ♂♂ w cm Sxlf7,M1ct6 v/Y; msl-21/CyO; and C. y w cm P{w+mC SxlΔPm} Sxlf18, f32ct6/Binsinscy; P{U2af-traF w+mW.hs}2B/+ ☿☿ × ♂♂ y w Sxlf18, f32 ct6/Y; Dp(1;3)sn13a1, cm+Sxl+ct+/+.
% viability relative to the reference class (ref) indicated (no. individuals in that reference class), based on adult eclosion. U2af-traF had no effect on Sxlf7,M1/ SxlM1,fΔ33 viability. Only Sxl-mutant females that survived the entire 5-d laying test were included in the egg-laying calculations.
Virgin females were mated with four or five virgin Ore-R males 1–2 d after eclosion and then were allowed to lay for five successive days, with transfers to fresh food each day.
At least one egg laid over the 5-d test period qualified a female as “laying.”
Calculation based on pooled data for all 5 d of egg collection.
For individual laying females.