Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 17;305(9):E1145–E1153. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00405.2013

Table 3.

Adipocyte number in WT and PAPP-A KO mice

Cell Number (×105)
Males
Females
Weeks on HFD WT KO WT KO
ING
    0 100 ± 8 80 ± 7 85 ± 9 78 ± 9
    10 121 ± 14 82 ± 13 77 ± 9 63 ± 9
20 109 ± 11 115 ± 18 76 ± 9 63 ± 10
SS
    0 79 ± 10 69 ± 8 89 ± 6 80 ± 12
    10 95 ± 11 76 ± 11 50 ± 6 58 ± 8
    20 82 ± 7 72 ± 9 77 ± 12 51 ± 5
pGON
    0 83 ± 15 48 ± 4* 96 ± 16 43 ± 9*
    10 73 ± 11 95 ± 28 97 ± 18 58 ± 6
    20 99 ± 9 119 ± 24 127 ± 10 105 ± 26
pREN
    0 18 ± 1 14 ± 2 24 ± 3 13 ± 3*
    10 29 ± 3 24 ± 3 21 ± 3 15 ± 2
    20 33 ± 7 25 ± 4 26 ± 3 24 ± 5
Mes
    0 134 ± 28 131 ± 15 127 ± 24 122 ± 18
    10 79 ± 12 113 ± 11 85 ± 7 101 ± 14
    20 68 ± 6 89 ± 8 79 ± 21 106 ± 16

Adipocyte nos., calculated as described in materials and methods, are presented as means ± SE of n = 8–12 mice. Mice at 7 wk of age were fed a HFD for 10 and 20 wk. Mice of the same age and fed a chow diet for 10 wk are referred to as 0 wk on HFD.

*

Significant difference between WT and PAPP-A KO, P < 0.05.