Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct 23;1(5):e00124. doi: 10.1002/phy2.124

Table 2.

Comparison of measured and predicted maximal oxygen uptake (Inline graphicO2max).

Bias (95% CI) (mL·kg−1·min−1) RMSE (mL·kg−1·min−1) SEE (mL·kg−1·min−1) r
Bruce −8.3 (−14.0, −2.6)* 11.2 6.4 0.53
UCLA −3.3 (−9.7, 3.0) 9.1 7.4 0.38
WFI −6.4 (−11.8, −1.1)* 9.6 6.3 0.36
Shuttle −2.1 (−7.7, 3.4) 7.6 4.5 0.45
Cycle −5.2 (−11.9, 1.6) 10.3 8.0 0.27
Overall −5.1 (−7.4, −2.7)* 9.6 6.7 0.42

N = 50 for Overall and N = 10 for all other protocols. WFI, Wellness Fitness Initiative; Bias, predicted Inline graphicO2max – measured Inline graphicO2max; CI, confidence interval; RMSE, root mean squared error; SEE, standard error of the estimate; r, Pearson product-moment correlation.

*

Predicted Inline graphicO2max significantly different than measured Inline graphicO2max.