Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 26;8(11):e79965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079965

Table 3. Comparison of POMS between HIT and CT.

POMS factors Exercise session p t Effect size (CI95%)
HIT CT
M SD M SD
Pre
Tension 5.4 4.2 5.1 2.7 >.05 .23 .08 (−.64, .79)
Hostility 1.6 2.1 1.3 1.9 >.05 .00 .13 (−.58, .85)
Fatigue 3.7 4.4 3.6 2.3 >.05 .04 .02 (−.70, .74)
Vigor 13.0 4.8 11.3 4.8 >.05 .94 .35 (−.37, 1.07)
Confusion 3.7 2.1 5.0 1.7 >.05 1.53 −.67 (−1.41, .07)
Depression 1.1 1.8 1.3 1.9 >.05 .32 −.11 (−.82, .61)
TMD 102.5 10.2 105.0 8.1 >.05 .64 .27 (−.99, .44)
Post
Tension 3.9 2.3 3.5 2.8 >.05 .35 .15 (.37, 1.92)
Hostility 1.0 1.5 .6 1.2 >.05 .63 .44 (−.29, 1.16)
Fatigue 8.7 4.9 4.2 2.5 <.01 3.30 −.39 (−1.11, .34)
Vigor 13.2 4.4 11.1 5.2 >.05 1.20 .00 (−.72, .72)
Confusion 3.7 2.9 4.7 2.0 >.05 1.21 .18 (−.53, .90)
Depression .7 1.2 .7 1.5 >.05 .00 .09 (−.62, .81)
TMD 104.9 14.0 102.7 9.4 >.05 .56 .37 (.07, .67)

CI95% - confidence interval; effect size classifications must be interpreted as <.20, trivial; .21–.60, small; .61–1.20, moderate; 1.21–2.0, large; 2.21–4.00, very large; and >4.00, nearly perfect.