Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 22;15(11):e257. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2662

Table 2.

Primary outcome measures: improvements and differences between groupsa.

Outcome measures n Intervention, mean (95% CI) n Control, mean (95% CI) Difference, I-Cb(95% CI) ES P value
Total PA, PASE (0-400)

Baseline 100 163 (130-196) 97 160 (123-197)

3 months 85 162 (136-187) 79 163 (137-190) −1.6 (−16.6 to 13.5) −0.01 .84

12 months 74 174 (150-198) 71 153 (125-181) 21.2 (3.6-38.9) 0.18 .02
Total PA (accelerometer min/day)

Baseline 39 369 (299-439) 40 395 (322-468)

3 months 27 361 (312-411) 30 358 (310-407) 3 (−26 to 32) 0.02 .83

12 months 24 361 (317-406) 28 338 (291-384) 24 (0.5-46.8) 0.19 .045
Physical functioning (0-100)

Baseline 99 58.8 (51.5-66.0) 98 55.2 (47.9-62.5)

3 months 84 67.8 (59.2-76.4) 80 61.3 (52.7-69.9) 6.5 (1.8-11.2) 0.20 .006

12 months 75 67.9 (59.1-76.7) 72 62.9 (54.1-71.7) 5.0 (−1.0 to 11.0) 0.17 .1
Self-perceived effect (improved-not improved)

3 months, n (%) improved 85 44 (44) 83 7 (7.1) 10.7c (4.3-26.4) <.001

12 months, n (%) improved 76 34 (34) 74 27 (27.3) 1.2c (0.6-2.4) .5

aFor PA, physical functioning, and self-perceived effect, a higher score indicates an improvement. Results are based on GEE analyses and adjusted for corresponding baseline variables, age, OA location, and gender.

bI-C: difference between intervention and control group.

codds ratio