Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 11;15(11):e255. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3002

Table 2.

State health departments’ use of Twitter.

Tweet category Tweet subcategory n (%)
Organization-centric 1230/4221 (29.14%)

Engagement to build community 809/1236 (65.77%)


Recognition of other organization’s events 353/809 (43.63%)


Giving thanks and recognition 173/809 (21.38%)


Ask for feedback or suggestions 28/809 (3.46%)


Respond to public reply messages 67/809 (8.28%)


Ask for response to a tweet 32/809 (3.96%)


Ask for a relationship 29/809 (3.58%)


Retweet a post 27/809 (3.34%)


Other 100/809 (12.36%)

Information about the organization 338/1230 (27.48%)


Events or services 141/338 (41.72%)


Job announcements 77/338 (22.78%)


Facts 50/338 (14.79%)


News 26/338 (7.69%)


Reports 1/338 (0.30%)


Other 44/338 (13.02%)

Action 82/1230 (6.67%)


Attend events 29/82 (35.37%)


Attend meetings to provide input 6/82 (7.32%)


Complete a survey 5/82 (6.10%)


Donate goods or money 2/82 (2.44%)


Volunteer time 13/82 (15.85%)


Participate in lobbying and/or advocacy 20/82 (24.39%)


Other 7/82 (8.54%)
Personal health information-centric 2928/4221 (69.37%)

Information 1519/2928 (52.05%)


Public health information 1399/1519 (92.10%)


Risk communication 63/1519 (4.15%)


Reports 27/1519 (1.78%)


Other 30/1519 (1.97%)

Action 1409/2926 (48.12%)


Learn more 640/1409 (45.42%0


Modify lifestyle 523/1409 (37.12%)


Preventive health screenings 124/1409 (8.80%)


Other 122/1409 (8.66%)
News 51/4221 (1.21%)
Miscellaneous 12/4221 (0.28%)