Table 6.

Mediation: examination of indirect effects and bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

	Indirect effect (β)	95% CIs
MEN (N = 246) INDIRECT PATH
Internalization → Body dissatisfaction → Disordered eating	0.24*	0.161–0.282
Internalization → Drive for thinness → Disordered eating	0.27*	0.181–0.300
Internalization → Drive for muscularity → Disordered eating	0.12*	0.048–0.168
Internalization → Self-esteem → Disordered eating	0.05*	0.020–0.117
WOMEN (N = 447) INDIRECT PATH
Internalization → Body dissatisfaction → Disordered eating	0.35*	0.235–0.382
Internalization → Drive for thinness → Disordered eating	0.36*	0.279–0.398
Internalization → Drive for muscularity → Disordered eating	0.04*	0.022–0.111
Internalization → Self-esteem → Disordered eating	0.10*	0.044–0.190

^*p < 0.05.