Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;110(10):2440–2449. doi: 10.1152/jn.00246.2013

Table 3.

ERC results for individual channels by task and stimulus modality

Laser Stimulus Electric Stimulus
Attention
    Out Fp1: 10/16 Fp1: 9/16
Pz: 10/16 Fp2: 9/16
F3: 9/16 Cz: 12/16
C3: 10/16 C3: 10/16
Cz: 12/16
    In O2: 9/16 T6: 10/16
Pz: 10/16 Cz: 13/16
Cz: 13/16 F4: 9/16
P3: 12/16
T4: 10/16
    Total Pz: 12/16 Fp1: 10/16
O2: 10/16 Cz: 12/16
Cz: 10/16 Fp2: 10/16
C3: 13/16 C3: 13/16
Distraction
    Out C3: 12/16 C4: 12/16
Cz: 13/16 T6: 9/16
T6: 10/16
Pz: 12/16
P4: 10/16
    In Cz: 12/16 F8: 10/16
C4: 10/16 O1: 19/16
O2: 9/16
P4: 10/16
C3: 13/16
T3: 12/16
    Total Cz: 12/16 F4: 10/16
C3: 12/16 T6: 10/16
T6: 10/16 C3: 12/16
P4: 12/16 Fp1: 10/16
Pz: 13/16 O1: 10/16

Channels with significantly larger numbers of event-related causality (ERC) pairs (1-way Wilcoxon, P = 0.01) are listed in increasing order. Ratios next to channel labels represent proportion of subjects who showed results consistent with the overall result.