Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e82347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082347

Table 2. Determination of the genetic effect of APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism on POAG and subgroup analyses.

Genetic Contrasts   Comparisons   Studies   (n) Heterogeneity   test
Model selected OR(95%CI)
P value   I2
ε2 vs ε3 Overall 9 0.217 25.4 Fixed 1.034 (0.871,1.227)
Caucasian 3 0.23 32 Fixed 1.118 (0.827,1.513)
Asian 5 0.213 31.3 Fixed 1.038 (0.835,1.290)
ε4 vs ε3 Overall 9 0 72.5 Random 0.965(0.700,1.329)
Caucasian 3 0.592 0 Fixed 1.045(0.807,1.353)
Asian 5 0 81.6 Random 0.913(0.540,1.544)
ε2/2 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.992 0 Fixed 0.950(0.482,1.871)
Caucasian 3 0.727 0 Fixed 0.870(0.280,2.705)
Asian 5 0.932 0 Fixed 1.046(0.363,3.018)
ε2/3 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.037 51.3 Random 0.964(0.706,1.317)
Caucasian 3 0.265 24.7 Fixed 1.092(0.758,1.574)
Asian 5 0.053 57.1 Fixed 1.060(0.830,1.355)
ε2/2 + ε2/3 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.059 46.6 Fixed 1.025(0.842,1.248)
Caucasian 3 0.24 30 Fixed 1.063(0.742,1.523)
Asian 5 0.052 57.5 Fixed 1.062(0.832,1.356)
ε2/2 vs ε3/3 + ε2/3 Overall 9 0.994 0 Fixed 0.979(0.499,1.920)
Caucasian 3 0.761 0 Fixed 0.858(0.276,2.664)
Asian 5 0.94 0 Fixed 1.028(0.358,2.955)
ε4/4 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.641 0 Fixed 1.339(0.763,2.350)
Caucasian 3 0.807 0 Fixed 1.561(0.723,3.375)
Asian 5 0.698 0 Fixed 1.663(0.642,4.309)
ε3/4 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.001 69.7 Random 0.917(0.637,1.321)
Caucasian 3 0.839 0 Fixed 0.879(0.635,1.215)
Asian 5 0.001 78.4 Random 0.852(0.491,1.476)
ε3/4 + ε4/4 vs ε3/3 Overall 9 0.001 70.4 Random 0.938(0.655,1.342)
Caucasian 3 0.799 0 Fixed 0.930(0.681,1.270)
Asian 5 0 80.6 Random 0.893(0.503,1.586)
ε4/4 vs ε3/3 + ε3/4 Overall 9 0.621 0 Fixed 1.325(0.757,2.321)
Caucasian 3 0.805 0 Fixed 1.604(0.745,3.453)
Asian 5 0.834 0 Fixed 1.637(0.632,4.236)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.