Table 3.
Relationship between age and radiation pneumonitis in 3D-CRT for BC in world literature
| Author, Year * | Country | n | RP endpoint | Prognostic groups | Test type (results) | p value | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lind et al. 1994–1998 [20] |
Duke’s |
613 |
Clinical RP, Grade > 2 |
Median age |
Mann–Whitney test |
0.64 |
RP > Grade 2 only (retrospective) |
| (RP- vs RP+) |
(54.9 yrs vs 55.2 yrs) |
||||||
| Lind et al. 1994–1998 [17] |
Sweden |
180 |
Clinical RP CTC-NCIC |
Mean age |
Students t-test |
<0.001 |
Loco-regional RT after mastectomy |
| (RP- vs RP+) |
(55.4 yrs vs 62.6 yrs) |
||||||
| Kahan et al. 2001 – 2004 [31] |
Hungary |
119 |
Radiological RP – CTC 2.0 |
Mean age |
Student’s t-test |
0.012 |
- |
| (RP- vs RP+) |
(56.2 yrs vs 61.5 yrs) |
||||||
| Jaen et al. 2002 [44] |
Spain |
39 |
Perfused lung volume (%) |
≤55 yrs, >55 yrs |
Box plot: ≤55 yrs vs >55 yrs |
NS |
Reduced perfusion in older age group |
| Kubo et al. 2005 – 2007 [24] | Japan | 413 | Radiological RP – CTC/AE 3.0 | ≤50 yrs,>50 yrs | Cox regression model |
0.20 | Only tangential whole breast irradiation |
| (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.49 – 1.2) |
RP radiation pneumonitis, n number of patients, CI confidence interval, CTC/CTC-NCIC common toxicity criteria, RT radiotherapy, *year of data collection, NS statistically not significant.