Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 4;31(35):4407–4415. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2315

Table 4.

Multivariable Regression Models Predicting Domains of Neurocognitive Impairment

Parameters Intelligence
Academic
Attention
Memory
RR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P RR 95% CI P RR 95% CI P
CRT, Gy
    None 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
    18 1.46 0.46 to 4.60 .52 8.13 1.67 to 39.59 .01 1.48 0.96 to 2.30 .08 2.05 0.86 to 4.86 .11
    24 6.63 2.54 to 17.27 < .001 8.56 2.08 to 35.26 .003 2.15 1.46 to 3.18 < .001 5.04 2.33 to 10.94 < .001
Age at diagnosis (years)*
Age at diagnosis by CRT, Gy
    None
    18
    24
Time since diagnosis (per 1 year)*
Time since diagnosis by CRT, Gy
    None
    18
    24
Sex
    Male 1.0 1.0
    Female 1.61 1.10 to 2.36 .02 3.62 1.86 to 7.04 < .001
Sex by CRT, Gy
    Male
        None
        18
        24
    Female
        None
        18
        24
IV methotrexate (1 g/m2)
Processing Speed
Executive Function
Behavior Rating
Cognitive Rating
RR 95% CI P RR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.05 0.60 to 1.83 .86 1.62 0.22 to 11.77 .63 1.83 0.91 to 3.70 .09 2.66 0.96 to 7.35 .06
1.09 0.64 to 1.86 .75 0.46 0.07 to 2.90 .41 1.72 0.78 to 3.80 .18 0.86 0.24 to 3.11 .82
1.05 1.01 to 1.09 .03
1.0 1.0
1.47 0.77 to 2.81 .24 2.66 0.96 to 7.35 .06
1.57 0.83 to 2.97 .16 0.86 0.24 to 3.11 .82
1.0 1.0
1.19 0.54 to 2.64 .67 0.60 0.22 to 1.67 .33
3.25 1.68 to 6.30 < .001 1.95 0.97 to 3.91 .06
1.03 1.00 to 10.6 .03

NOTE. ORs were used instead of RRs for academic, behavioral rating, and cognitive rating outcomes because of lower frequency of severe impairment on these outcomes. (—) Indicates variables that were not retained in the models based on Akaike information criterion.

Abbreviations: CRT, cranial radiation therapy; IV, intravenous; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk.

*

Represented as a continuous variable; effect indicates increased risk with each year.

Significant risk based on interaction between age at diagnosis or time since diagnosis and cranial radiation dose.