Skip to main content
. 2013 May 23;22(12):2827–2835. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2822-5

Table 2.

Association between improvement in scores (from preop to 12 months’ follow-up) and global outcome (0 = poor, 1 = good) at 12 months’ follow-up

Variable 12 Months postoperatively
Individual indicators Multiple regression
Change scorea preop to 12 mo postop in OR 95 % CI p value OR 95 % CI p value
Average LBP in the last week 1.346 1.151; 1.574 <0.0001
Average leg pain in the last week 1.577 1.309; 1.900 <0.0001
Average of all pain scales 2.073 1.564; 2.746 <0.0001 1.687 1.187; 2.398 0.004
General health 1.303 1.108; 1.532 0.001 1.246 1.004; 1.545 0.045
MSPQ + ZUNG (psychological disturbance) 1.127 1.070; 1.187 <0.0001 1.073 1.006; 1.144 0.033
Roland Morris Disability 1.396 1.225; 1.591 <0.0001 1.243 1.074; 1.439 0.004
FABQ-physical activity 1.087 1.030; 1.148 0.002
Catastrophising 1.151 1.069; 1.241 <0.0001

FABQ-physical activity Fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity, LBP low back pain, MSPQ Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (enquires about the frequency of somatic symptoms experienced in the last week), ZUNG ZUNG self-rated depression

aThe change scores (preop to 12 months postop) were calculated such that a positive value indicated an improved status (i.e. reduced pain, better general health, reduced catastrophising, etc.)