Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 25.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Dec 31;27(4):10.1037/a0031368. doi: 10.1037/a0031368

Table 3.

Summary of results from MLM growth curve analyses

Percent Days Abstinent Drinks per Drinking Day

b SE p-value b SE p-value
Intercept 25.968 5.710 <.001 2.180 .094 <.001
Intercept X Change 4.182 8.382 .620 .063 .152 .683
Time -3.945 3.283 .230 -.067 .025 .008
Time X Change 29.256 4.446 <.001 -.551 .093 <.001
Time2 1.397 .686 .042 .000 .003 .972
Time2 X Change -4.820 .853 <.001 .051 .011 <.001
Time3 -.095 .046 .040 .000 .000 .429
Time3 X Change .282 .056 <.001 -.0013 .0003 <.001
Time4 .002 .001 .055 -- -- --
Time4 X Change -.005 .001 <.001 -- -- --

Note: Change is a level 2 moderator with 0 = gradual changers and 1 = rapid changers. Runtime level 1 n=990. Percent Days Abstinent was estimated with restricted maximum likelihood with robust standard errors and Drinks per Drinking Day with Poisson estimation with robust standard errors. To reduce the number of intervals and to fit the most parsimonious models, past history intervals were entered as a summary variable due to minimal changes in drinking over the 166 days; therefore, 23 time intervals were included in all final analyses. All time effects were estimated as fixed effects.