Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 14;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-20-58

Table 2.

Comparison of other genetic alterations between AML patients in low and high BDH2 expression groups

Variant Number of patients with the gene alternation (percentage)
P
Whole cohort Low BDH2, expression High BDH2, expression
NPM1mut
36 (31.85%)
16 (28.07%)
20 (35.71%)
0.271
FLT3-ITD
23 (20.35%)
7 (12.28%)
16 (28.57%)
0.030*
FLT3-TKD
8 (7.08%)
5 (8.77%)
3 (5.36%)
0.338
NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg
20 (17.70%)
11(19.30%)
9 (16.07%)
0.368
CEBPAa
34 (30.09%)
16 (28.07%)
18 (32.14%)
0.444
CEBPADouble mutation
9 (7.96%)
3 (5.26%)
6 (10.71%)
0.593
IDH1b
3 (3.75 %)
1 (2.56 %)
2 (4.88%)
0.592
IDH2b
8 (10 %)
3 (7.69%)
5 (12.20%)
0.508
DNMT3Ab
12 (15 %)
10 (25.641%)
2 (4.88%)
0.009*
MLLb
7 (8.75%)
3 (7.69%)
4 (9.76%)
0.426
ERGc
11.17 (10.26-12.08)
11.60 (10.48-12.72)
10.68 (9.17-12.20)
0.320
MN1c
12.98 (12.28-13.68)
13.35 (12.42-14.28)
12.55 (11.47-13.64)
0.257
miR-181ac
3.12 (2.57-3.67)
3.17 (2.35-3.98)
3.07 (2.30-3.84)
0.864
miR-3151c 12.35 (11.90-12.80) 12.18 (11.53-12.84) 12.53 (11.89-13.16) 0.448

Values are number (%) of patients with alteration.

aCEBPAsingle and double mutations.

bOnly 80 patients with high quality of DNA to sequence; 39 patients are low BDH2 expression and 41 patients are high expression.

cMean (95% CI).

*Statistically significant (P < 0.05).