Table 2.

Power performance of the proposed tests at 0.05 nominal significance level using the parameters in Table three, Troendle et al. [[19]] and n = 100

Sample size			p	Disease model		Model					TDT	zcom
s	n	m		Model	(ψ1,ψ2)	Dom	Rec	Mult	Unr	Add
				Dom	(2.6, 2.6)	0.91066	0.06000	0.50500	0.84541	0.70714		0.31163
		25	0.5	Rec	(1.0, 2.2)	0.04523	0.90067	0.70559	0.83608	0.57124		0.47878
				Mult	(1.8, 3.24)	0.48646	0.68023	0.88068	0.80862	0.87348		0.65977
0	100			Unr	(0.65, 1.54)	0.32262	0.93172	0.34347	0.92475	0.17819		0.22527
				Dom	(2.6, 2.6)	0.84710	0.05676 ∗	0.44357	0.76226	0.63856	0.44186
		0	0.5	Rec	(1.0, 2.2)	0.04665 ∗	0.84330	0.63678	0.76013	0.50830	0.63486
				Mult	(1.8, 3.24)	0.44423 ∗	0.62624 ∗	0.82447	0.74065	0.81753	0.82465
				Unr	(0.65, 1.54)	0.24177	0.87274	0.30563	0.84850	0.15914	0.30947
				Dom	(2.6, 2.6)	0.96437	0.08869	0.56774	0.92870	0.79380
		25	0.5	Rec	(1.0, 2.2)	0.05605	0.95407	0.76586	0.91508	0.61764
				Mult	(1.8, 3.24)	0.49237	0.71043	0.92158	0.86355	0.91256
50	100			Unr	(0.65, 1.54)	0.55513	0.98255	0.38476	0.98123	0.17861
				Dom	(2.6, 2.6)	0.93871	0.07985	0.51548	0.88896	0.74713
		0	0.5	Rec	(1.0, 2.2)	0.05134	0.92769	0.71809	0.87193	0.55984
				Mult	(1.8, 3.24)	0.45734	0.66902	0.88925	0.82026	0.87906
				Unr	(0.65, 1.54)	0.47192	0.96392	0.34894	0.96087	0.16023
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.89874	0.05076	0.76992	0.83080	0.84520		0.53247
		25	0.2	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.03613	0.92147	0.48451	0.87037	0.30487		0.31694
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.69925	0.34702	0.85778	0.77836	0.85218		0.62966
0	100			Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.65567	0.84785	0.10276	0.94265	0.03027		0.08794
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.84384	0.04086 ∗	0.70946	0.75109	0.78697	0.70494
		0	0.2	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.03782 ∗	0.86147	0.43153	0.79210	0.26755	0.42869
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.64051 ∗	0.32123 ∗	0.80066	0.70908	0.79017	0.79740
				Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.54538	0.75786	0.10187	0.87870	0.02940	0.09909
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.94780	0.08895	0.82800	0.90217	0.90049
		25	0.2	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.05440	0.97394	0.53918	0.95030	0.31670
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.72728	0.34717	0.90222	0.83592	0.89492
50	100			Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.83495	0.95478	0.10560	0.98840	0.02343
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.91980	0.07593	0.78331	0.85809	0.86423
		0	0.2	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.04721	0.95163	0.49510	0.91409	0.28013
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.67942	0.32597	0.86532	0.78885	0.85618
				Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.77111	0.92279	0.10152	0.97278	0.02310
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.57438	0.02821	0.53632	0.43550	0.56002		0.33291
		25	0.05	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.04380	0.29455	0.06729	0.21332	0.04873		0.06352
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.38400	0.10189	0.42547	0.34874	0.41536		0.26377
0	100			Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.22082	0.27767	0.18594	0.32682	0.12097		0.14033
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.50622	0.03413	0.47104	0.39360	0.49103	0.46796
		0	0.05	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.04448	0.27724	0.06733	0.20273	0.04704	0.06674
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.33877	0.10807	0.36803	0.31909	0.36089	0.36674
				Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.17709	0.25044	0.15031	0.26490	0.06971	0.17677
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.63920	0.01453	0.58425	0.47921	0.62697
		25	0.05	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.04465	0.28842	0.06893	0.23235	0.04345
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.42156	0.08232	0.46540	0.36949	0.46364
50	100			Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.30208	0.31549	0.20745	0.42153	0.15479
				Dom	(2.2, 2.2)	0.58412	0.01814	0.54315	0.42708	0.57007
		0	0.05	Rec	(1.0, 3.6)	0.04222	0.29220	0.06943	0.22264	0.04549
				Mult	(1.9, 3.61)	0.38029	0.08648	0.42651	0.33479	0.41893
				Unr	(0.5, 2.0)	0.27336	0.30692	0.18868	0.37802	0.12098

∗ indicates entry that is slightly lower than the corresponding entry of Table three, Troendle et al. [19].