Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 4;14:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-14-78

Table 3.

Power performance of the proposed tests at 0.05 nominal significance level using the parameter in Table three, Troendle et al. [19]and n = 500

Sample size
p
Disease model
Model
 
TDT
zcom
s n m   Model (ψ1,ψ2) Dom Rec Mult Unr Add    
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.5, 1.5)
0.91984
0.05494
0.59684
0.86250
0.67998
 
0.38389
 
 
125
0.5
Rec
(1.0, 1.45)
0.04830
0.91488
0.68434
0.85930
0.61349
 
0.46383
 
 
Mult
(1.3, 1.69)
0.54475
0.63588
0.88638
0.81607
0.88395
 
0.67525
0
500
 
 
Unr
(0.82, 1.22)
0.40678
0.94369
0.28652
0.95067
0.19831
 
0.19157
 
 
Dom
(1.5, 1.5)
0.86469
0.05501
0.53494
0.78362
0.61161
0.53133
 
 
 
0
0.5
Rec
(1.0, 1.45)
0.04868
0.86048
0.62189
0.78284
0.54995
0.61559
 
 
 
Mult
(1.3, 1.69)
0.50217
0.58591
0.83504
0.74791
0.82951
0.83316
 
 
 
 
 
Unr
(0.82, 1.22)
0.30751
0.88989
0.25717
0.89710
0.18219
0.25521
 
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.5, 1.5)
0.93417
0.05975
0.61089
0.88359
0.69680
 
 
 
 
125
0.5
Rec
(1.0, 1.45)
0.04970
0.93022
0.70132
0.87754
0.62959
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.3, 1.69)
0.55266
0.64473
0.89571
0.83059
0.89378
 
 
50
500
 
 
Unr
(0.82, 1.22)
0.46190
0.95843
0.29617
0.96292
0.20571
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.5, 1.5)
0.88543
0.05450
0.55038
0.81938
0.63176
 
 
 
 
0
0.5
Rec
(1.0, 1.45)
0.04813
0.88221
0.63748
0.81229
0.56987
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.3, 1.69)
0.50941
0.59514
0.85057
0.77031
0.84857
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unr
(0.82, 1.22)
0.35793
0.91611
0.26407
0.92113
0.18285
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.91663
0.05581
0.82275
0.85564
0.85475
 
0.59268
 
 
125
0.2
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04455
0.94790
0.44326
0.90851
0.34805
 
0.28523
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.74330
0.29700
0.86030
0.77766
0.85735
 
0.63475
0
500
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.75736
0.83819
0.16262
0.95415
0.09838
 
0.11611
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.86430
0.05206
0.76184
0.78832
0.79620
0.76041
 
 
 
0
0.2
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04254
0.90108
0.39325
0.84045
0.30808
0.38860
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.67838
0.27300
0.79869
0.70763
0.79626
0.79935
 
 
 
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.65414
0.73828
0.14995
0.90150
0.09179
0.14809
 
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.92776
0.05929
0.83556
0.87192
0.86570
 
 
 
 
125
0.2
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04580
0.95984
0.45325
0.92594
0.35732
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.75081
0.29775
0.86878
0.79374
0.86823
 
 
50
500
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.79247
0.87274
0.17039
0.96622
0.09941
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.88237
0.05344
0.78154
0.81038
0.81656
 
 
 
 
0
0.2
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04352
0.92016
0.40450
0.87014
0.31454
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.69361
0.27258
0.81773
0.72982
0.81359
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.69897
0.78788
0.15242
0.92672
0.09045
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.54540
0.01899
0.51668
0.41742
0.53330
 
0.32711
 
 
125
0.05
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04787
0.19369
0.06095
0.15167
0.04953
 
0.05595
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.37363
0.06127
0.39755
0.30298
0.39613
 
0.25117
0
500
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.32954
0.14447
0.25594
0.32487
0.23685
 
0.16860
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.47895
0.02234
0.45528
0.35409
0.46737
0.45051
 
 
 
0
0.05
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04759
0.17392
0.06026
0.13605
0.04958
0.05914
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.32514
0.06317
0.34478
0.26105
0.34585
0.34717
 
 
 
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.28430
0.12649
0.22702
0.27964
0.20895
0.22606
 
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.55918
0.01811
0.53173
0.43260
0.54426
 
 
 
 
125
0.05
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04848
0.20376
0.06147
0.15963
0.04985
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.38246
0.06150
0.41190
0.31308
0.40672
 
 
50
500
 
 
Unr
(0.73, 1.37)
0.34311
0.14948
0.27061
0.34266
0.22740
 
 
 
 
Dom
(1.45, 1.45)
0.49431
0.02036
0.46935
0.36889
0.48220
 
 
 
 
0
0.05
Rec
(1.0, 2.0)
0.04777
0.17937
0.06071
0.14178
0.05204
 
 
 
 
Mult
(1.35, 1.82)
0.33955
0.06127
0.36054
0.26850
0.35641
 
 
        Unr (0.73, 1.37) 0.29572 0.13457 0.23367 0.29240 0.20284    

∗ indicates entry that is slightly lower than the corresponding entry of Table three, Troendle et al. [19].