Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Aug 12;173(15):10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7727. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.7727

Table 2.

Mean cognitive function test scores averaged over time for women grouped by treatment assignment with adjustment for age and visit.

Cognitive Function Test Treatment Assignment
Mean Standardized Difference HT Minus Placebo:*
SD Units [95% CI]
p-value HT vs Placebo p-value MPA vs No MPA
CEE+MPA
Mean (SE)
CEE+MPA Placebo
Mean (SE)
CEE
Mean (SE)
CEE Placebo
Mean (SE)

Global cognitive function
 TICS-m 38.08 (0.20) 38.26 (0.21) 37.67 (0.26) 37.28 (0.27) 0.02 [−0.08, 0.12] 0.66 0.23
Verbal Memory
 EBMT immediate 10.20 (0.07) 10.17 (0.07) 9.98 (0.09) 10.01 (0.09) −0.00 [−0.09, 0.09] 0.97 0.70
 EBMT delayed 9.88 (0.08) 9.78 (0.08) 9.57 (0.10) 9.59 (0.10) 0.02 [−0.07, 0.12] 0.67 0.49
 Sum 20.08 (0.13) 19.95 (0.14) 19.55 (0.17) 19.61 (0.18) 0.01 [−0.08, 0.11] 0.82 0.56
Attention
 OTMT-A 8.95 (0.13) 8.57 (0.14) 8.97 (0.16) 8.93 (0.17) −0.06 [−0.15, 0.03] 0.16 0.26
Executive function
 OTMT-B 43.26 (2.19) 42.14 (2.32) 46.76 (2.81) 50.02 (2.91) −0.00 [−0.10, 0.10] 0.95 0.35
Verbal fluency
 VF-A 21.04 (0.25) 20.65 (0.27) 18.90 (0.33) 19.91 (0.34) −0.05 [−0.15, 0.05] 0.29 0.02
Working memory
 Digits forward 8.33 (0.11) 8.60 (0.12) 8.64 (0.14) 8.48 (0.14) −0.02 [−0.12, 0.08] 0.66 0.09
 Digits backward 7.10 (0.11) 7.09 (0.12) 7.26 (0.14) 7.11 (0.15) 0.03 [−0.07, 0.13] 0.55 0.62
 Sum 15.42 (0.20) 15.69 (0.22) 15.90 (0.26) 15.59 (0.27) 0.00 [−0.10, 0.11] 0.93 0.23
Composite 0.03 (0.04) 0.04 (0.05) −0.09 (0.06) −0.08 (0.06) −0.01 [−0.11, 0.09] 0.78 0.94
*

Ordered so that positive score indicates better cognitive function in HT; Logarithm transformations used for executive function

1

Fitted mean (95% confidence interval) treatment effects for verbal fluency: CEE+MPA 0.07 [−0.06,0.19]; CEE −0.17 [−0.33,−0.02]