Table 2.
Cognitive Function Test | Treatment Assignment
|
Mean Standardized Difference HT Minus Placebo:* SD Units [95% CI] |
p-value HT vs Placebo | p-value MPA vs No MPA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEE+MPA Mean (SE) |
CEE+MPA Placebo Mean (SE) |
CEE Mean (SE) |
CEE Placebo Mean (SE) |
||||
| |||||||
Global cognitive function | |||||||
TICS-m | 38.08 (0.20) | 38.26 (0.21) | 37.67 (0.26) | 37.28 (0.27) | 0.02 [−0.08, 0.12] | 0.66 | 0.23 |
Verbal Memory | |||||||
EBMT immediate | 10.20 (0.07) | 10.17 (0.07) | 9.98 (0.09) | 10.01 (0.09) | −0.00 [−0.09, 0.09] | 0.97 | 0.70 |
EBMT delayed | 9.88 (0.08) | 9.78 (0.08) | 9.57 (0.10) | 9.59 (0.10) | 0.02 [−0.07, 0.12] | 0.67 | 0.49 |
Sum | 20.08 (0.13) | 19.95 (0.14) | 19.55 (0.17) | 19.61 (0.18) | 0.01 [−0.08, 0.11] | 0.82 | 0.56 |
Attention | |||||||
OTMT-A | 8.95 (0.13) | 8.57 (0.14) | 8.97 (0.16) | 8.93 (0.17) | −0.06 [−0.15, 0.03] | 0.16 | 0.26 |
Executive function | |||||||
OTMT-B | 43.26 (2.19) | 42.14 (2.32) | 46.76 (2.81) | 50.02 (2.91) | −0.00 [−0.10, 0.10] | 0.95 | 0.35 |
Verbal fluency | |||||||
VF-A | 21.04 (0.25) | 20.65 (0.27) | 18.90 (0.33) | 19.91 (0.34) | −0.05 [−0.15, 0.05] | 0.29 | 0.02 |
Working memory | |||||||
Digits forward | 8.33 (0.11) | 8.60 (0.12) | 8.64 (0.14) | 8.48 (0.14) | −0.02 [−0.12, 0.08] | 0.66 | 0.09 |
Digits backward | 7.10 (0.11) | 7.09 (0.12) | 7.26 (0.14) | 7.11 (0.15) | 0.03 [−0.07, 0.13] | 0.55 | 0.62 |
Sum | 15.42 (0.20) | 15.69 (0.22) | 15.90 (0.26) | 15.59 (0.27) | 0.00 [−0.10, 0.11] | 0.93 | 0.23 |
Composite | 0.03 (0.04) | 0.04 (0.05) | −0.09 (0.06) | −0.08 (0.06) | −0.01 [−0.11, 0.09] | 0.78 | 0.94 |
Ordered so that positive score indicates better cognitive function in HT; Logarithm transformations used for executive function
Fitted mean (95% confidence interval) treatment effects for verbal fluency: CEE+MPA 0.07 [−0.06,0.19]; CEE −0.17 [−0.33,−0.02]