Table 1.
No. of cells | Total recorded cells (%) | Reward-related responses (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Total no. of recorded cells | 385 | 100 | |
No. of reward-related units | 66 | 17.1 | 100 |
Firing rate response | |||
Increase | 61 | 92.4 | |
Decrease | 5 | 7.6 | |
Response timing relative to reward site arrival | |||
Prior to arrival | 20 | 30.3 | |
After arrival | 20 | 30.3 | |
During both phases | 26 | 39.3 | |
Reward availability | |||
Reward present | 39 | 59.1 | |
Reward absent | 9 | 13.6 | |
Differential responses between conditions | 5 | 7.6 | |
Reward sites | |||
1 site | 21 | 31.8 | |
2 sites | 9 | 13.6 | |
3 sites | 6 | 9.1 | |
Differential responses between sites | 9/15 | 60.0 | |
Reward availability and reward sites | |||
Differential firing to presence and sites | 26 | 39.3 | |
Firing pattern not specific for any condition | 8 | 12.1 |
Shown is an overview of the number of significant reward-related correlates. A total of 66 reward-related correlates were identified from 385 units (Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed rank test, p < 0.01). Subsets of reward-related correlates, classified under ″Reward availability″ and ″Reward sites,″ responded differentially to the presence/absence of reward or to the reward sites, respectively, whereas the remaining neurons were less selective in their firing profiles. The term ″differential responses″ between reward presence and reward absence indicates that, in both conditions, a significant response was observed but the amplitude of the responses was significantly different (Kruskall–Wallis, p < 0.05; Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05). The same specification holds for differential responses between reward sites. Some neurons discriminated between reward presence/absence and between reward sites. These are listed under ″Differential firing to presence and sites.″