Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2013 Sep 9;88(6):10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.009. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.08.009

Table 3.

Odds ratios (and 95% CI) of the relationship between each measure of psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive effectiveness level

Individual psychological distress measures Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
Depressive symptoms (n = 247)
    Continuous measure (range: 1-57) 1.021* (1.001-1.043) 1.020 (0.998-1.042)
    Dichotomous (score ≥ 35.4) 2.21* (1.14-4.28) 2.40* (1.20-4.82)
Anxiety symptoms (n = 253)
    Continuous measure (range: 0-40) 1.029 (0.999-1.060) 1.030 (0.999-1.063)
    Dichotomous (score ≥ 15) 1.58 (0.82-3.05) 1.62 (0.82-3.21)
Stress symptoms (n = 253)
    Continuous measure (range: 0-42) 1.028* (1.004-1.051) 1.025* (1.001-1.050)
    Dichotomous (score ≥ 26) 1.75 (0.90-3.39) 1.59 (0.80-3.15)
Negative affect (n = 248)
    Continuous measure (range: 0-30) 1.051** (1.013-1.090) 1.054** (1.014-1.096)
    Dichotomous (score ≥ 16.8) 2.11* (1.12-3.99) 2.31* (1.182-4.52)
Global psychological distress (n = 253)
    Continuous measure (range: 1.46** (1.10-1.94) 1.46** (1.09-1.95)
    Dichotomous (score ≥ .87) 2.16* (1.11-4.19) 2.15* (1.08-4.33)

Notes. Models are ordinal logistic regression ones where the outcome is three levels: 0 = low effective methods, 1 = moderately effective methods, and 2 = highly effective methods. Adjusted model includes: age, self-identified race/ethnicity, marital status, education level, number of previous abortions, number of children, trimester of abortion, and importance of preventing pregnancy in next year.

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p ≤ .01