Table 1.

Primate TRIM Genes Evolving Under Positive Selection

TRIM Gene	M7vsM8 (2lnλ)	P Value	% of Positively Selected Sites	Average dN/dS for Selected Sites	Positively Selected Sites	No. of Primate Taxa
TRIM2	7.31	0.026	0.64	1.54	98, 497	12
TRIML2	6.03062	0.049	3.63	8.74	277	8
TRIM5	73.47	<0.005	20.46	3.29	7, 139, 175, 182, 213, 215, 228, 257, 258, 310, 311, 317, 324, 379, 381, 382, 418, 421, 423, 471, 483	22
TRIM7	9.92	0.007	0.36	11.04	258	10
TRIM10	6.06	0.048	2.00	3.62	152, 329	11
TRIM15	10.74	<0.005	5.86	2.25	18, 42, 150, 460	11
TRIM21	7.02	0.03	3.38	4.81	124, 407	10
TRIM22	10.20	<0.005	4.89	6.17	99, 171, 220, 308	13
TRIM25	19.27	<0.005	9.39	2.40	58, 259, 297, 338, 377, 415, 418, 420, 435	10
TRIM31	15.06	<0.005	5.27	8.68	72, 227, 250	7
TRIM38	6.51	0.039	3.66	2.94	215	12
TRIM52	16.51	<0.005	6.66	5.84	75, 111, 149, 153, 221	7
TRIM58	17.75	<0.005	4.24	2.34	223, 443, 472, 475, 480	10
TRIM60	8.00	0.018	20.43	2.15	8, 82, 96, 134, 200, 251, 252, 255, 264, 271, 302, 322, 370, 405, 459	11
TRIM69	6.65	0.036	19.16	2.46	14, 158, 192, 226, 246, 261, 285, 353, 371, 473	10
TRIM75	10.61	<0.005	0.67	12.24	45, 227	10
TRIM76	42.29	<0.005	1.71	7.94	306, 651, 1507, 2727, 2797, 3314	10

Note.—PAML model M7 (Ns sites model disallowing positive selection) was directly compared with M8 (Ns sites model permitting one extra category of codons evolving under positive selection) to detect positive selection (Yang 2007). We indicate the category of codons that were found to be in the category of positively selected codons and the average dN/dS associated with those codons. Sites underlined were also found to be under positive selection by Datamonkey (Delport et al. 2010).