Table 5.
Results of analysis of tablets by the proposed methods and statistical comparison with the reference method.
| Tablets analysed | Label claim, mg/tablet | Found* (percent of label claim ± SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference method | Proposed methods | ||||
| Method A | Method B | Method C | |||
| Asthafen | 1 | 100.8 ± 0.91 | 101.4 ± 0.89 | 102.8 ± 1.91 | 102.1 ± 1.75 |
| t = 1.05 | t = 2.11 | t = 2.16 | |||
| F = 1.05 | F = 4.41 | F = 3.7 | |||
|
| |||||
| Ketasma | 1 | 102.3 ± 1.02 | 100.6 ± 0.98 | 102.8 ± 1.36 | 101.3 ± 0.88 |
| t = 2.69 | t = 0.66 | t = 1.66 | |||
| F = 1.08 | F = 1.78 | F = 1.34 | |||
*Mean value of five determinations;
Tabulated t value at the 95% confidence level is 2.78.
Tabulated F value at the 95% confidence level is 6.39.