Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 12;2013:697651. doi: 10.1155/2013/697651

Table 5.

Results of analysis of tablets by the proposed methods and statistical comparison with the reference method.

Tablets analysed Label claim, mg/tablet Found* (percent of label claim ± SD)
Reference method Proposed methods
Method A Method B Method C
Asthafen 1 100.8 ± 0.91 101.4 ± 0.89 102.8 ± 1.91 102.1 ± 1.75
t = 1.05 t = 2.11 t = 2.16
F = 1.05 F = 4.41 F = 3.7

Ketasma 1 102.3 ± 1.02 100.6 ± 0.98 102.8 ± 1.36 101.3 ± 0.88
t = 2.69 t = 0.66 t = 1.66
F = 1.08 F = 1.78 F = 1.34

 *Mean value of five determinations;

Tabulated t value at the 95% confidence level is 2.78.

Tabulated F value at the 95% confidence level is 6.39.