Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Genet. 2011 Nov 2;81(1):10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01797.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01797.x

Table 4.

Logistic regression; effects of personal/family history sub-population on outcomes

Outcome Measure Odds Ratio 95% CI p-value
Intend to get BRCA Testing
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 1.27 0.87– 1.83 0.21
Exposure to Risk Information** 0.65 0.45–0.95 0.02
Interaction*** 0.21
Prefer Clinic Testing
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 1.46 1.07– 1.99 0.02
Exposure to Risk Information** 1.22 0.89–1.67 0.21
Interaction*** 0.25
Positive Attitudes about Internet Testing
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 0.71 0.50– 0.99 0.05
Exposure to Risk Information** 0.63 0.44–0.92 0.02
Interaction*** 0.31
Trust Internet Testing
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 1.28 0.94– 1.73 0.12
Exposure to Risk Information** 1.13 0.83–1.54 0.44
Interaction*** 0.72
Believe Internet Testing is Wise
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 1.08 0.80– 1.46 0.63
Exposure to Risk Information** 0.84 0.62–1.15 0.28
Interaction*** 0.46
Site Provides Enough Risk Information
Population: women with a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancers* 0.81 0.59– 1.12 0.20
Exposure to Risk Information** 1.78 1.29–2.46 <0.001
Interaction*** 0.118

CI= 95% confidence interval, Info=information

*

control group is women without a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancer.

**

control group is women who were not exposed to risk information.

***

interaction between sub-population (women with and without a personal/family history of breast/ovarian cancer) and exposure to risk information.