Table 2.
|
Total |
|
NOR |
|
GS |
|
GA |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRS scorea | IRS scorea | IRS scorea | IRS scorea | |||||
In situ PGI staining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex |
|
0.265 |
|
0.002 |
|
0.599 |
|
0.964 |
Female |
4.0(2.0,7.0) |
|
5.0(4.0,7.5) |
|
6.0(4.0,9.0) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.3) |
|
Male |
3.0(0.0,7.0) |
|
9.0(7.0,10.5) |
|
6.0(2.5,8.5) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.0) |
|
Age(years) |
|
0.003 |
|
0.681 |
|
0.183 |
|
0.563 |
<50 |
4.0(2.0,9.0) |
|
7.5(5.5,9.3) |
|
7.0(3.0,10.0) |
|
2.0(1.0,4.0) |
|
≥50 |
3.0(0.0,6.0) |
|
7.5(5.0,10.8) |
|
5.0(3.0,7.0) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.0) |
|
H. pylori IgG |
|
0.359 |
|
/ |
|
0.515 |
|
0.659 |
EIU < 34 |
3.0(1.0,6.0) |
|
7.5(5.0,10.0) |
|
5.0(3.0,9.3) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.0) |
|
EIU ≥ 34 |
2.0(0.0,6.0) |
|
/ |
|
6.0(4.0,8.8) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.5) |
|
In situ PGII staining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex |
|
0.073 |
|
0.363 |
|
0.245 |
|
0.643 |
Female |
3.0(1.0,7.0) |
|
7.0(4.5,11.0) |
|
6.0(4.0,9.0) |
|
3.0(1.0,5.0) |
|
Male |
5.0(2.0,7.0) |
|
9.0(7.5,10.0) |
|
5.0(3.0,9.0) |
|
2.0(1.3,4.0) |
|
Age(years) |
|
0.003 |
|
0.198 |
|
0.260 |
|
0.173 |
<50 |
5.0(2.0,9.0) |
|
7.5(4.0,9.0) |
|
6.5(3.3,9.8) |
|
3.0(2.0,5.8) |
|
≥50 |
3.0(0.0,6.3) |
|
9.5(6.0,11.0) |
|
5.0(2.0,8.0) |
|
2.0(1.0,4.0) |
|
H. pylori IgG |
|
0.942 |
|
/ |
|
0.344 |
|
0.069 |
EIU < 34 |
3.0(1.0,6.0) |
|
8.5(5.8,10.3) |
|
6.0(2.0,9.0) |
|
2.0(1.0,3.0) |
|
EIU ≥ 34 |
3.0(0.0,6.0) |
|
/ |
|
5.5(4.0,9.8) |
|
3.0(2.0,5.5) |
|
In situ PGI/PGII staining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sex |
|
0.453 |
|
0.123 |
|
1.000 |
|
0.650 |
Female |
0.8(0.4,1.3) |
|
0.8(0.5,1.0) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.5) |
|
0.6(0.2,1.2) |
|
Male |
0.8(0.0,1.1) |
|
1.0(0.8,1.2) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.5) |
|
0.8(0.4,1.0) |
|
Age(years) |
|
0.011 |
|
0.530 |
|
0.864 |
|
0.462 |
<50 |
1.0(0.6,1.3) |
|
1.0(0.6,1.6) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.4) |
|
1.0(0.4,1.0) |
|
≥50 |
0.7(0.0,1.0) |
|
01.0(0.8,1.0) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.5) |
|
0.7(0.1,1.0) |
|
H. pylori IgG |
|
0.062 |
|
/ |
|
0.763 |
|
0.599 |
EIU < 34 |
0.9(0.3,1.4) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.1) |
|
1.0(0.7,1.5) |
|
0.8(0.2,2.5) |
|
EIU ≥ 34 | 0.6(0.0,1.0) | / | 1.0(0.7,1.4) | 0.7(0.4,1.0) |
a, IRS of PGI, PGII and PGI/II ratio were represented as median (25%, 75%); b, in situ expression of PGI, PGII, PGI/II ratio between two groups were compared by Mann–Whitney test. Analyses results with P < 0.05 were highlighted in bold characters.