Table 4.
Ownership and use gaps
| Background characteristic |
Ownership gap |
Use gap |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Households with no ITN% (95% CI) | Households with insufficient ITN if any ITN% (95% CI) | People with access not using ITN% (95% CI) | |
| Residence |
|
|
|
| Urban |
66.7% (59.4, 73.8) |
66.6% (60.1, 70.3) |
29.2% (17.9, 40.4) |
| Rural |
54.4% (51.4, 60.2) |
66.5% (62.9, 69.8) |
16.0% (10.3, 22.9) |
| Zone |
|
|
|
| North Central |
67.9% (56.6, 77.6) |
71.1% (65.1, 81.5) |
28.3% (9.7, 46.9) |
| North East |
35.5% (26.4, 45.9) |
58.8% (52.7, 64.6) |
5.6% (0.1, 11.1) |
| North West |
41.7% (31.5, 52.7) |
70.7% (64.9, 75.9) |
8.7% (0.3, 17.1) |
| South East |
67.8% (57.6, 76.4) |
60.5% (50.6, 69.7) |
44.6% (25.3, 63.7) |
| South South |
56.1% (47.4, 64.7) |
71.4% (65.0, 77.0) |
21.6% (10.9, 32.3) |
| South West |
78.8% (65.4, 88.0) |
57.2% (51.5, 62.8) |
49.2% (15.6, 82.8) |
| Region |
|
|
|
| North |
48.0% (41.6, 54.5) |
67.2% (63.4, 70.9) |
10.7% (5.6, 16.0) |
| South |
69.1% (62.6, 75.0) |
64.3% (59.8, 68.5) |
35.9% (30.7, 41.2) |
| ITN campaign |
|
|
|
| Yes |
25.5% (21.6, 29.9) |
63.5% (59.7, 67.0) |
17.4% (13.9, 20.9) |
| No |
77.7% (73.7, 81.2) |
71.6% (66.6, 76.4) |
24.3% (14.0, 34.6) |
| Wealth quintile |
|
|
|
| Lowest |
53.2% (44.5, 61.7) |
64.5% (58.2, 70.4) |
6.4% (0.1, 13.0) |
| Second |
59.1% (52.0, 65.7) |
67.0% (60.9, 72.5) |
14.9% (6.6, 23.2) |
| Third |
54.8% (48.3, 61.1) |
64.5% (58.5, 70.1) |
19.7% (11.6, 27.8) |
| Fourth |
64.0% (58.2, 69.5) |
71.9% (66.5, 76.8) |
23.1% (15.8, 30.4) |
| Highest |
60.1% (53.1, 66.6) |
64.7% (58.6, 70.4) |
37.9% (26.5, 49.3) |
| Total | 58.0% (53.5, 62.4) | 66.2% (63.2, 69.0) | 18.8% (13.4, 24.2) |