. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Dec;20(4):10.1007/s10880-013-9373-0. doi: 10.1007/s10880-013-9373-0

Table 3.

Regression results for the multiple mediator model with intervention condition as independent variable, religious well-being, existential well-being, adaptive coping, and maladaptive coping as parallel mediators, post-intervention suicidal ideation as outcome, and age, relationship status, homelessness, and monthly income as covariates

Regression results	Coefficient	t	P
1. BSS Part I regressed on IC (c)	−1.17	−2.49	.01
2. RWB regressed on IC (a₁)	.050	−.030	.96
3. EWB regressed on IC (a₂)	3.61	1.91	.06
4. AC regressed on IC (a₃)	4.92	2.66	.01
5. MAC regressed on IC (a₄)	−2.20	−1.30	.20
6. BSS Part I regressed on RWB controlling for EWB, AC, MAC, and IC (b₁)	.043	1.41	.16
7. BSS Part I regressed on EWB controlling for RWB, AC, MAC, and IC (b₂)	−.123	−4.49	<.001
8. BSS Part I regressed on AC controlling for RWB, EWB, MAC, and IC (b₃)	−.039	−1.34	.19
9. BSS Part I regressed on MAC controlling for RWB, EWB, AC, and IC (b₄)	.066	2.04	.045
7. BSS Part I regressed on IC controlling for RWB, EWB, AC, and MAC (c’)	−.386	−.872	.39

Indirect effects	Value	SE
Total indirect effects (a₁b₁ + a₂b₂ + a₃b₃ + a₄b₄)	−.783	.360
a₁b₁	−.002	.095
a₂b₂	−.443	.265
a₃b₃	−.193	.173
a₄b₄	−.145	.137

95 % confidence interval based on 10,000 bootstrap samples	Lower limit	Upper limit
Total indirect effects (a₁b₁ + a₂b₂ + a₃b₃)	−1.58	−.164
a₁b₁	−.232	.177
a₂b₂	−1.15	−.026
a₃b₃	−.650	.065
a₄b₄	−.535	.029

BSS Part I beck scale for suicidal ideation—part I, IC intervention condition, RWB religious well-being from spiritual well-being scale, EXB existential well-being from spiritual well-being scale, AC adaptive coping from brief COPE, MAC maladaptive coping from brief COPE