Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 Dec;20(4):10.1007/s10880-013-9373-0. doi: 10.1007/s10880-013-9373-0

Table 4.

Regression results for the multiple mediator model with intervention condition as independent variable, religious well-being, existential well-being, adaptive coping, and maladaptive coping as parallel mediators, post-intervention depressive symptoms as outcome, and age, relationship status, homelessness, and monthly income as covariates

Regression results Coefficient t P
1. BDI-II regressed on IC (c) −7.14 −2.49 <.001
2. RWB regressed on IC (a1) −.050 −.030 .98
3. EWB regressed on IC (a2) 3.61 1.91 .06
4. AC regressed on IC (a3) 4.92 2.66 .01
5. MAC regressed on IC (a4) −2.20 −1.30 .20
6. BDI-II regressed on RWB controlling for EWB, AC, MAC, and IC (b1) .012 .074 .94
7. BDI-II regressed on EWB controlling for RWB, AC, MAC, and IC (b2) −.851 −5.76 <.001
8. BDI-II regressed on AC controlling for RWB, EWB, MAC, and IC (b3) −.102 −.643 .52
9. BDI-II regressed on MAC controlling for RWB, EWB, AC, and IC (b4) .436 2.49 .02
7. BDI-II regressed on IC controlling for RWB, EWB, AC, and MAC (c’) −2.61 −1.09 .28
Indirect effects Value SE
Total indirect effects (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3 + a4b4) −4.53 2.23
a1b1 −.001 .277
a2b2 −3.07 1.75
a3b3 −.501 .858
a4b4 −.958 .843
95 % confidence interval based on 10,000 bootstrap samples Lower limit Upper
limit
Total indirect effects (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3 + a4b4) −8.97 −.148
a1b1 −.590 .600
a2b2 −6.90 −.025
a3b3 −2.77 .848
a4b4 −3.26 .200

BDI-II beck depression inventory-II, IC intervention condition, RWB religious well-being from spiritual well-being scale, EXB existential well-being from spiritual well-being scale, AC adaptive coping from brief COPE, MAC maladaptive coping from brief COPE