Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;8:33. doi: 10.1186/1750-9378-8-33

Table 1.

Distribution of KIR genes in the Busselton control population and the group of Western Australian women with a history of CIN

KIR gene
Cases
Controls
p-valuea
p-value correctedb
  n = 147 n = 187    
2DL1
144 (98.0%)
178 (94.2%)
0.149
1
2DL2
67 (45.6%)
108 (57.1%)
0.046*
0.644
2DL3
136 (92.5%)
170 (89.9%)
0.531
1
2DL4
147 (100%)
189 (100%)
1
1
2DL5
78 (53.1%)
100 (52.9%)
0.978
1
3DL1
133 (90.5%)
177 (93.7%)
0.382
1
3DL2
147 (100%)
189 (100%)
1
1
3DL3
147 (100%)
189 (100%)
1
1
2DS1
58 (39.5%)
76 (40.2%)
0.978
1
2DS2
68 (46.3%)
109 (57.7%)
0.049*
0.686
2DS3
44 (29.9%)
55 (29.1%)
0.964
1
2DS4**
55 (37.4%)
77 (40.7%)
0.612
1
2DS5
50 (34.0%)
57 (30.2%)
0.526
1
3DS1 61 (41.5%) 78 (41.3%) 0.967 1

CIN, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; KIR, Killer immunoglobulin-like receptor.

aχ2 test with Yates correction was performed; p-values < 0.05 are indicated in bold for χ2 test.

bCorrected p-values were determined by adjusting p-values for multi-gene analysis using Bonferroni’s correction.

*OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 – 0.9.

**2DS4 psuedogenes not counted.