Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 8;14:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-134

Table 2.

Assessment and predicted weight characteristics, and the difference scores between methods of prediction

Case
Assessment
Predicted HBW using different methods (kg)
Return of menses (ROM; kg)
Difference between HBW predictions (kg)
  Weight (kg) Height (cm) BMI (kg/m2) BMI-SDS (kg/m2) Growth Curve (GC) method BMI method   GC method – ROM BMI method – ROM
1
49.9
165.4
18.2
−0.99
60.0
57.0
60.0
.00
3.00
2
40.7
160.0
15.7
−1.54
59.0
48.9
57.0
−2.00
8.10
3
46.0
172.8
15.4
−2.63
63.8
60.5
62.3
−1.50
1.80
4
46.9
162.3
17.8
−0.04
51.5
50.0
49.6
−1.90
-.40
5
46.0
167.0
16.5
−1.63
53.0
55.6
58.0
5.00
2.40
6
57.1
172.0
19.3
−0.46
58.0
60.8
57.5
-.50
−3.30
7
39.4
149.0
15.6
−1.23
50.0
43.5
50.7
.70
7.20
8
40.8
165.0
15.1
−3.48
52.0
57.0
52.8
.80
−4.20
9
37.3
166.0
13.5
−2.82
56.5
51.5
56.5
.00
5.00
Average 44.9 164.4 16.3 −1.65 55.98 53.89 56.04 .067 2.18