Table 3.
Archetype C
KT archetype and organizing logic | Explorative dimension | Exploitative dimension | Strengths | Leadership challenges |
---|---|---|---|---|
Archetype C |
Research governance maintained by academics who determine research questions and process. |
Exploitation supported by development of implementation skills, as organized by central management. |
Quick start to implementation process as not waiting for new research findings to be produced. |
Boundary between implementation and research themes, stymieing integration between their efforts. |
Modular independence | Highly autonomous exploration with no explicit need to accommodate new significant stakeholder groups. |
Existing external knowledge used, such as systematic reviews and other published accounts of research outputs. |
Autonomous research process attractive to highly qualified academics who are not needing to change their research practice; this increases likelihood of high impact generalizable findings. | Low co-production of research topic risks knowledge outputs having low relevance to local stakeholders. |
Exploratory focus maintains academic autonomy. | No explicit link with in-house research process. |
|||
Increases absorptive capacity through acquired skills in identifying and appraising research evidence and reviews. |