Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar 11;101(12):4250–4255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306398101

Table 1. Representation of bacterial phyla in the distal esophagus and subgingival crevice.

Number (%) of clones
Distal esophagus
Subgingival crevice* (n = 2252)
Phylum A (n = 186) B (n = 205) C (n = 264) D (n = 245) Total (mean ± SD) (n = 900)
Firmicutes 132 (70.9) 128 (62.4) 178 (67.4) 188 (76.7) 626 (69.5 ± 6.0) 659 (26.1)
Bacteroidetes 35 (18.8) 61 (29.8) 49 (18.6) 37 (15.1) 182 (20.2 ± 6.4) 234 (9.3)
Actinobacteria 3 (1.6) 3 (1.5) 25 (9.5) 8 (3.3) 39 (4.3 ± 3.8) 275 (11.0)
Proteobacteria 6 (3.2) 4 (2.0) 5 (1.9) 5 (2.0) 20 (2.2 ± 0.6) 338 (13.4)
Fusobacteria 6 (3.2) 7 (3.4) 2 (0.8) 5 (2.0) 20 (2.2 ± 1.2) 353 (14.0)
TM7 4 (2.1) 2 (1.0) 5 (1.9) 2 (0.8) 13 (1.4 ± 0.6) 34 (1.3)
Spirochaetes 0 0 0 0 0 537 (21.3)
Deferribacteres 0 0 0 0 0 86 (3.4)
Obsidian pool OB11 0 0 0 0 0 6 (0.0)
*

From Paster et al. (9)