Table 2.

Ratios of mean estimated parameter values for tDCS compared with sham condition

	${\widehat{\mathit{p}}}_{\mathbf{1}}$	${\widehat{\mathit{p}}}_{\mathbf{2}}$	${\widehat{\mathit{p}}}_{\mathbf{3}}$	${\widehat{\mathit{p}}}_{\mathbf{4}}$	${\widehat{\mathit{p}}}_{\mathbf{5}}$
tDCS/sham	2.45a	0.74b	0.89	2.26c	1.00

^aSignificance, P = 0.04, ^bSignificance, P = 0.08, and ^cSignificance, P = 0.03. Statistical analyses were performed by analysis of variance to identify main effects in experimental condition comparisons.