Table 4.
Simulations of bias associated with different strengths of co-coverage, using SBA and ANC as an example.
| SBA coverage | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 40% | 60% | 80% | Pearson r | |
| Scenario 1: No co-coverage | |||||
| Lives saved | 7700 | 10400 | 13100 | 15800 | 0.00 |
| Scenario 2: Weak co-coverage | |||||
| Lives saved | 7840 | 10680 | 13520 | 16360 | 0.08 to 0.10 |
| Bias | -1.8% | -2.6% | -3.1% | -3.4% | |
| Scenario 3: Moderate co-coverage | |||||
| Lives saved | 7180 | 10360 | 13540 | 16720 | 0.24 to 0.30 |
| Bias | 7.2% | 0.4% | -3.2% | -5.5% | |
| Scenario 4: Strong co-coverage | |||||
| Lives saved | 6990 | 10480 | 13970 | 17460 | 0.40 to 0.51 |
| Bias | 10.2% | -0.8% | -6.2% | -9.5% | |