Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 11;14:193. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-193

Table 3.

Change of Cys C and GFR after EECP treatment (n = 30)

Characteristics
Median (IQR)
Baseline
End of 35th session
Follow-up
Estimated GFR      
GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 12)
n = 12
n = 9
n = 12
Cystatin C (mg/L)
1.55
1.44
1.4
 
(1.26-1.85)
(1.2-1.59)
(1.14-1.65)
p-value
 
0.173 a
0.004 b **
GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
43.59
46.11
47.52
 
(39.1-53.29)
(42.06-47.26)
(41.1-55.76)
p-value
 
0.374 a
0.003 b **
GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 18)
n = 18
n = 18
n = 18
Cystatin C (mg/L)
0.83
0.82
0.8
 
(0.73-0.89)
(0.72-0.91)
(0.63-0.92)
p-value
 
0.931 a
0.052 b
GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
86.05
92.34
88.81
 
(75.16-103.3)
(83.46-105.38)
(81.22-109.79)
p-value
 
0.157 a
0.124 b
NT-proBNP
 
 
 
NT-proBNP ≤125 pg/mL (n = 9)
n = 9
n = 9
n = 9
Cystatin C (mg/L)
0.78
0.82
0.81
 
(0.76-0.87)
(0.72-0.87)
(0.77-0.87)
p-value
 
0.906 a
0.553 b
GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
86.69
88.75
83.11
 
(85.28-92.84)
(83.46-105.23)
(81.42-96.54)
p-value
 
0.374 a
0.767 b
NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL (n = 20)
n = 20
n = 17
n = 20
Cystatin C (mg/L)
1.26
1.16
1.14
 
(0.94-1.68)
(0.84-1.53)
(0.88-1.51)
p-value
 
0.523 a
0.001 b**
GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
59.43
57.66
62.26
 
(43.31-74.47)
(46.11-91.46)
(46.97-83.18)
p-value
 
0.246 a
0.001 b**
NT-proBNP decline >30% from baseline (n = 10 )
n = 10
n = 9
n = 10
Cystatin C (mg/L)
1.01
1.00
0.97
 
(0.81-1.31)
(0.77-1.2)
(0.69-1.2)
p-value
 
0.594 a
0.017 b*
GFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
65.53
66.87
66.46
 
(43.68-79.98)
(47.26-93.98)
(49.02-91.85)
p-value   0.214 a 0.051 b

Values are Median (25th-75th percentile). p- value was calculated with the use of Wilcoxon signed ranks test, a End of 35th session versus baseline; b Last follow-up versus baseline.

(*) indicated statistically significant p-value less than 0.05; (**) indicated statistically significant p-value less than 0.01.