Table 2.
Left-ear syllables | Right-ear syllables | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Time window | Right-ear phonological task | Right-ear non-phonological task | Left-ear phonological task | Left-ear non-phonological task |
(A) SUPPRESSION EFFECTS ON AUDITORY SYLLABLES DURING AUDITORY TASKS | ||||
150–200 msa | ns | ns | ns | ns |
200–250 msa | 0.5 (0.2)** | 0.5 (0.2)** | 0.5 (0.2)** | ns |
250–300 msa | 0.5 (0.2)** | 0.4 (0.2)* | 0.4 (0.2)** | ns |
(B) SUPPRESSION EFFECTS ON SPOKEN SYLLABLES DURING THE VISUAL PHONOLOGICAL TASK | ||||
150–200 msa | ns | ns | ||
200–250 msa | ns | ns | ||
250–300 msa | 0.5 (0.1)** | ns |
RPs were obtained by subtracting ERPs to the left-ear and right-ear syllables during the visual non-phonological (VNP) task from ERPs to the left-ear and right-ear syllables, respectively, that were to be ignored during phonological or non-phonological task involving the opposite-ear syllables (RP/RNP and LP/LNP, respectively) or during the visual phonological (VP) task.
(A) RP in ERPs to spoken syllables delivered to one ear during attention to the opposite ear and (B) RP in ERPs to spoken syllables during the VP task at Cz electrode are reported if statistically significant from zero.
Significance from one-sided t-tests Bonferroni corrected for t-tests at the 3 predetermined time windows.
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05, ns, non-significant. Time windows written in bold font were analyzed further with ANOVAs.