Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 30;9:171. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-171

Table 9.

Description of access to veterinary services and disease control practices in the farm as reported during the calf recruitment visit

    Frequency Percent
Access to veterinary services
544
 
 
Yes
 
461
84.7
No
 
83
15.3
Type of Veterinary support
461
 
 
Private animal health worker
 
264
57.3
Government animal health worker
 
176
38.2
Veterinary drug supplier
 
23
5.0
Farmer
 
10
2.2
Tick-control
548
 
 
Yes
 
498
90.9
No
 
50
9.1
Application method
498
 
 
Spraying whole body
 
462
92.7
Spraying legs only
 
9
1.8
Pour on
 
6
1.2
Hand dressing
 
25
5.0
Dipping
 
8
1.6
Other (traditional,manual removal)
 
10
2
Worm control
548
 
 
Yes
 
309
56.4
No
 
239
43.6
Application method
309
 
 
Drench
 
265
85.8
Bollet
 
47
15.2
Others (injectables/unknown)
 
2
0.6
Traditional
 
5
1.6
Trypanosome control
548
 
 
Yes
 
98
17.9
No
 
450
82.1
Method used
98
 
 
Spraying whole body
 
51
52.0
Chemotherapy
 
32
32.7
Pour-on
 
10
10.2
Other (dipping/head dressing/
 
 
 
unknown)
 
8
8.2
Use of Vaccines
546
 
 
Yes
 
284
52.0
No
 
262
48.0
Frequency of use
277
 
 
Routinely
 
9
2.9
When need arises
 
269
97.1
Vaccine type used
284
 
 
Unknown
 
230
81.0
Anthrax
 
8
2.8
Black quarter
 
11
3.9
Contagious Bovine Pleural Pneumonia
 
1
0.4
Foot and mouth disease
 
25
8.8
Lumpy skin disease
 
18
6.3
Other   6 2.1