Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6633. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6633

Table 2.

Hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes according to updated 4-year changes in total red meat intakea

Changes in frequency of red meat consumption (categories in serving/d)
P for trendb
Moderate to large decrease (>0.50) Small to moderate decrease (0.15–0.50) No change/relatively stable (±0.14) Small to moderate increase (0.15–0.50) Moderate to large increase (>0.50)
HPFS
 Cases/person-years 336/69097 255/74221 458/133862 248/60190 264/44372
 Multivariate model 1c 1.06 (0.89–1.27) 0.92 (0.78–1.09) 1.00 1.21 (1.03–1.43) 1.59 (1.34–1.88) <0.001
 Multivariate model 2d 1.08 (0.90–1.29) 0.94 (0.80–1.12) 1.00 1.20 (1.01–1.41) 1.48 (1.25–1.75) 0.001

NHS
 Cases/person-years 658/128173 770/168022 1061/246411 587/117130 406/62021
 Multivariate model 1c 0.90 (0.80–1.01) 0.96 (0.87–1.06) 1.00 1.16 (1.05–1.28) 1.36 (1.21–1.53) <0.001
 Multivariate model 2d 0.95 (0.84–1.07) 0.98 (0.89–1.08) 1.00 1.10 (0.99–1.21) 1.22 (1.08–1.38) <0.001

NHS II
 Cases/person-years 466/141889 433/179136 682/296201 452/146734 464/98366
 Multivariate model 1c 1.00 (0.87–1.15) 0.98 (0.86–1.11) 1.00 1.30 (1.15–1.47) 1.55 (1.37–1.76) <0.001
 Multivariate model 2d 1.04 (0.90–1.19) 0.98 (0.86–1.11) 1.00 1.20 (1.06–1.36) 1.31 (1.16–1.49) <0.001

Poolede
 Multivariate model 1c 0.96 (0.89–1.04) 0.96 (0.89–1.03) 1.00 1.21 (1.13–1.30) 1.48 (1.37–1.59) <0.001
 Multivariate model 2d 1.00 (0.92–1.09) 0.97 (0.91–1.04) 1.00 1.15 (1.07–1.23) 1.30 (1.21–1.41) <0.001
a

Data are based on 20 years of follow-up (1986–2006) in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), 20 years of follow-up (1986–2006) in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), and 16 years of follow-up (1991–2007) in the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II). The exposure was change in red meat intake in each 4-year period, and the outcome was the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the subsequent 4 years.

b

P value for trend was derived from tests of linear trend across categories of changes in red meat consumption by treating the median value of the each category as a continuous variable.

c

Multivariate Model 1: adjusted for age, initial red meat intake (quintiles), race (white, non-white), marital status (with spouse, yes or not), family history of diabetes (yes or not), history of hypertension (yes or not), history of hypercholesterolemia (yes or not), and simultaneous changes in other lifestyle factors: smoking status (never to never, never to current, past to past, past to current, current to past, current to current, missing indicator), initial and change in alcohol intake (quintiles), initial and change in physical activity (quintiles), initial and change in total energy intake (quintiles), as well as initial and change in diet quality (Alternative Healthy Eating Index, quintiles). Among nurses, postmenopausal status and menopausal hormone use (NHS and NHS II) were also included.

d

Multivariate Model 2: model 1 plus initial BMI (<23, 23–24.9, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, ≥35 kg/m2) and weight change (quintiles) during the 4-year period.

e

The results across the three cohorts were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis.