Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun;33(3):10.1097/COC.0b013e3181a76a0b. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181a76a0b

Table1.

Individual FDG-PET SUV Data and Clinical Outcome

Patient SCAN 1
SUV
SCAN 2
SUV
% change by
SUV
% change
by Patlak
SCAN 3
SUV
Surgical Outcome Survival
(months)
1 3.1 na na na na unresectable 13.4
2 7.1 7.0 −1 −7 7.0 unresectable at
laparatomy
19.9
3 4.6 3.4 −26 −96 na unresectable 20.3
4 9.6 7.5 −21 −25 4.6 unresectable 8.9
5 7.8 na na na na unresectable 4.5
6 6.9 6.9 1 108 na unresectable 14.5
7 11.1 4.9 −56 −90 4.8 Resected 24.3
8 5.9 5.4 −8 −13 na unresectable 7.4
9 4.6 3.8 −18 −88 3.9 unresectable at
laparatomy
15.2
10 4.3 3.2 −26 53 2.4 unresectable at
laparatomy
8.8
11 8.0 6.2 −23 −27 na unresectable 5.0
12 4.6 4.0 −13 −53 4.1 Resected* 83.6
13 5.3 4.8 −11 −39 na unresectable 4.0
14 4.7 4.3 −9 −8 3.7 unresectable 14
15 9.4 4.4 −53 −68 3.3 Resected 22.2
16 5.5 4.1 −25 −36 4.0 unresectable at
laparatomy
14.2
17 6.7 5.8 −12 −33 4.6 unresectable 7.3
18 10.7 9.7 −10 −25 na unresectable 2.7
19 6.7 4.2 −38 −2 3.8 unresectable at
laparatomy
8.8
20 6.3 3.4 −46 −83 2.7 unresectable at
laparatomy
22.5
Mean 6.64 5.17 −21.83 % −29.68% 4.07
*

All the patients are deceased except patient # 12 who is still alive at the time of manuscript submission.

na = not available (i.e., missing data).