Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 28;19(44):8114–8132. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.8114

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Author, year Country Study design Group No. of patients Age(yr) Gender(M/F) BMI(kg/m2) ASA (1:2:3) Tumorsize (cm) Tumor stage1 Extent of LND Population
Dulucq et al[28], 2005 France PCS LTG 8 75 ± 8 3/5 NA NA 5.5 ± 2 NA D1 + β EGC + AGC
OTG 11 67 ± 14 5/6 NA NA 6.1 ± 0.4 NA
Usui et al[9], 2005 Japan RCS LTG 20 66.0 ± 10.4 13/7 21.3 ± 3.1 NA NA 8/10/2/0/0 D1 + β EGC + AGC
OTG 19 66.2 ± 10.2 14/5 22.1 ± 2.4 NA NA 10/8/1/0/0
Kim et al[34], 2008 South Korea RCS LTG 27 57.3 ± 14.2 16/11 22.6 ± 3.1 NA NA NA D1 + α/β, D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 33 61.6 ± 9.2 23/10 22.4 ± 2.1 NA NA NA
Mochiki et al[15], 2008 Japan RCS LTG 20 66 ± 2.4 16/4 NA NA 3.6 ± 0.5 NA D1 + β EGC
OTG 18 63 ± 2.2 16/2 NA NA 5.7 ± 0.8 NA
Topal et al[14], 2008 Belgium PCS LTG 38 68 (37-85) 23/15 24 (17-30) NA 47 (7-180) 0/17/7/10/4 D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 22 69 (38-86) 17/5 24 (17-30) NA 30 (10-180) 0/7/7/6/2
Kawamura et al[30], 2009 Japan RCS LTG 46 64 ± 10.4 10/36 22.8 ± 3.0 15/27/4 NA NA D2 EGC
OTG 35 65.2 ± 10.7 10/25 22.9 ± 2.4 14/15/6 NA NA
Sakuramoto et al[16], 2009 Japan RCS LTG 30 63.7 ± 9.2 12/18 21.9 ± 2.7 9/20/1 4.0 ± 2.9 0/25/2/3/0 D1 + β, D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 44 67.2 ± 9.9 10/34 22.5 ± 3.6 8/28/8 6.1 ± 3.7 0/15/17/12/0
Du et al[27], 2010 China RCS LTG 82 60.4 ± 18.5 54/28 22.3 ± 2.6 NA 5.4 ± 1.4 0/3/36/43/0 D2 AGC
OTG 94 57.8 ± 17.2 61/33 22.5 ± 2.4 NA 5.9 ± 1.6 0/6/31/57/0
Kim et al[33], 2011 South Korea RCS LTG 63 55.9 ± 12.2 43/20 22.7 ± 2.5 45/15/3 3.8 ± 2.1 NA D2 EGC
OTG 127 57.3 ± 11.1 81/46 23.0 ± 2.9 86/39/2 3.9 ± 2.7 NA
Eom et al[10], 2012 South Korea RCS LTG 100 54.9 ± 13.5 57/43 22.7 ± 2.8 NA 4.3 ± 2.9 NA D1 + β, D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 348 58.7 ± 11.5 254/94 23.8 ± 2.9 NA 4.4 ± 3.0 NA
Guan et al[17], 2012 China RCS LTG 41 60.7 ± 9.1 33/8 NA NA NA 0/18/20/3/0 D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 56 57.8 ± 9.9 40/16 NA NA NA 0/25/25/6/0
Siani et al[38], 2012 Italy RCS LTG 25 65 ± 8.5 15/10 NA NA NA 0/6/5/14/0 D1 + α/β, D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 25 66 ± 7.8 18/7 NA NA NA 0/4/5/16/0
Kim et al[32], 2013 South Korea RCS LTG 139 58 (30-84) 86/53 23.6 (13.6-32.4) 85/46/8 3.2 (0.2, 15) NA D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 207 56 (31-84) 134/73 24.1 (16.7-35.2) 137/52/18 4.0 (0.3, 22) NA
Jeong et al[29], 2013 South Korea RCS LTG 122 63.2 ± 11.2 89/33 23.1 ± 3.4 33/80/9 NA NA D1 + β, D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 122 62.6 ± 11.7 93/29 23.5 ± 3.2 43/67/12 NA NA
Lee et al[37], 2013 South Korea RCS LTG 50 50.6 ± 22.1 32/18 23.2 ± 3.7 34/11/5 NA 0/24/13/9/4 D2 EGC + AGC
OTG 50 51 ± 22.6 32/18 23 ± 3.4 31/16/3 NA 0/24/13/9/4

Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD or median and range.

1

Pathological tumor stage (0/I/II/III/IV). PCS: Prospective comparative study; RCS: Retrospective comparative study; LTG: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; OTG: Open total gastrectomy; BMI: Body mass index; NA: Not available; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; LND: Lymph node dissection; EGC: Early gastric cancer; AGC: Advanced gastric cancer; M/F: Male/female.