Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 20;3(2):283–288. doi: 10.5681/apb.2013.046

Table 2. A comparison of electrodiagnostic (NCV-EMG) results of CTS patients in the case and control groups before and after treatment.

Variables P value (Before and after treatment)
Case group Control group
Median nerve distal motor latency 0.178 0.879
Median nerve proximal motor latency 0.290 0.386
Median nerve distal motor amplitude 0.397 0.572
Median nerve proximal motor amplitude 0.506 0.518
Median nerve motor conduction velocity 0.498 0.514
Median nerve motor F 0.080 0.095
Median nerve sensory latency 0.001* 0.818
Median nerve sensory amplitude 0.008* 0.178
Median nerve sensory conduction velocity 0.034* 0.846
Ulnar nerve distal motor latency 0.592 0.732
Ulnar nerve proximal motor latency 0.427 0.921
Ulnar nerve distal motor amplitude 0.628 0.685
Ulnar nerve proximal motor amplitude 0.250 0.124
Ulnar nerve motor conduction velocity 0.948 0.278
Ulnar nerve motor F 0.159 0.299
Ulnar nerve sensory latency 0.642 0.737
Ulnar nerve sensory amplitude 0.072 0.752
Ulnar nerve sensory conduction velocity 0.892 0.579
Median nerve distal motor latency 0.178 0.879
* p<0.05