Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 10;13:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-139

Table 2.

Policies and reported practices towards pain management in children

 
At triage
In ER
  n (%) n (%)
Pain assessment:
 
 
  Never
0 (0.0)
1 (5.3)
  Sometimes
10 (52.6)
10 (52.6)
  Always
9 (47.4)
8 (42.1)
Use of algometric scales:
 
 
  No
6 (31.6)
10 (52.6)
  Yes
13 (68.4)
9 (47.4)
Results of pain assessment are recorded:
 
 
  No
5 (26.3)
7 (36.8)
  Yes
14 (73.7)
12 (63.2)
Availability of protocols for pain treatment:
 
 
  No
11 (57.9)
10 (52.6)
  Yes
8 (42.1)
9 (47.4)
Pain level contributes to priority determination at triage:
 
 
  No
11 (57.9)
 
  Yes
8 (42.1)
 
Use of EMLA cream if blood sampling is anticipated:
 
 
  Never/almost never (<10% of cases)
12 (63.1)
 
  Sometimes (10-50% of cases)
5 (26.3)
 
  Often/Always (>50% of cases)
2 (10.6)
 
Analgesic drugs mentioned in protocols (when available):*
 
 
  Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS)
 
10 (52.6)
  Paracetamol
 
10 (52.6)
  Opioids
 
6 (31.6)
  Adjuvants
 
5 (26.3)
Pain reassessment:
 
 
  Never/almost never (<10% of cases)
 
2 (10.5)
  Sometimes (10-50% of cases)
 
6 (31.6)
  Often (51-90% of cases)
 
8 (42.1)
  Always/almost always (>90% of cases)
 
3 (15.8)
Parental role in the emergency room:*
 
 
  Entering with the child
 
19 (100)
  Being present during painful procedures
 
17 (89.5)
  Holding the child during blood sampling   11 (57.9)

*Answers were not mutually exclusively.