Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Jun 10;143(2):736–744. doi: 10.1037/a0033171

Figure 1. (a) The specularly congruent and incongruent interpersonal multisensory stimulation (IMS) and (b) mean change in % (+ SEM) of frames judged as “self” across conditions and interoceptive sensitivity groups in Experiment 1 (point zero indicates the % of frames judged as “self” in pre-test).

Figure 1

Asterisks denote significant differences between means (* denotes p < .05, 2-tailed).