Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 23;10:102. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-102

Table 2.

Sequence Harmony results

 
 
 
 
Consensus stringd
 
Region Amino acid positiona SH-scoresb Z-scoresc High CrNAe Low CrNAf Clusterg
C1
E32
0.825
−5.5
Egd
Edkng
1
C1
K33
0.765
−6.7
KQn_e
QNdek
1
C1
V85
0.792
−4.8
Vkaei
Ver
2
C1
V87
0.843
−4.9
Ekg
Eadg
2
C1
K97
0.840
−5.1
Kint
Knr
3
C1
K130
0.843
−8.5
Ne
Nd
4
V1
L134
0.620
−11.4
Lf
VL_aim
5
V1
K135
0.346
−17.0
RKeqg
-hknwg
5
V1
N136
0.698
−12.9
Nt
N-t
5
V1
T138
0.585
−14.4
Tn_
-gast
6
V1
N139
0.650
−12.5
N_t
-nist
6
V1
T140
0.531
−12.0
Tiks_n
-alns
6
V1
.141
0.522
−13.2
T-spgn
SR-egk
6
V1
.141
0.368
−38.3
-tn
N
6
V1
.141
0.223
−24.4
-sktni
TAeiv
6
V1
.141
0.000
−69.1
-h
T
6
V1
.141
0.000
−45.6
-
Nads
6
V1
.141
0.664
−16.1
-ts
Tnsa_
6
V1
N141
0.418
−21.7
NTs
N-tip
6
V1
S142
0.697
−12.1
Ns
Nt_i
6
V1
.145
0.518
−17.3
W-g
Snw_
 
V1
.146
0.507
−15.8
-m
LI-vg
 
V1
K151
0.696
−8.3
E-GRtak
GK-qte
6
C2
E268
0.814
−4.6
Ekqg
Edgr
7
C2
V271
0.719
−15.3
Vi
Va
8
C2
V275
0.587
−9.0
Eknvad
Esnqk
3
V3
K322
0.611
−17.4
DE
Eaq
9
C3
I333
0.804
−15.5
Li
Il
10
C3
A336
0.684
−9.1
TAgvel
Aekv
10
C3
K337
0.686
−10.1
EQKntd
Knq
10
C3
K343
0.667
−8.4
Kqsg
EQKgnh
11
C3
A346
0.809
−15.9
AV
V
11
C3
S347
0.837
−3.1
TIndesk
NKEITr
11
V4
F396
0.578
−16.4
NT-wf
-NG
11
V4
T399
0.604
−10.9
-vt
RT-ans
11
V4
.403
0.686
−16.1
-t
N-s
 
V4
.404
0.537
−11.7
-ksr
KT-epn
 
V4
S405
0.661
−15.4
-Sdl
-evs
10
V4
N406
0.377
−34.9
N_t
-n
10
V4
N407
0.277
−18.9
N_srk
-thn
10
V4
.412
0.574
−13.5
-s
N-wde
 
V4
.412
0.689
−11.6
-
-snt
 
C4
S440
0.729
−6.8
Raks
KReg
12
V5
S461
0.650
−14.0
DE-sn
-n
 
V5
.464
0.692
−9.4
NEK-
-rk
13
V5
.464
0.557
−15.2
-nda
-Nti
13
gp41 Q621 0.540 −9.4 Kestardq EMYQNK  

aAmino acid numbering based on the HXB2 reference sequence.

bSequence Harmony scores (SH-scores): SH-scores below a cut-off of <0.7 for variable regions and a cut-off of <0.85 for conserved regions are shown.

cThe z-scores display the accuracy of a given result; the more negative the z-score the less likely it is that the results was found by chance.

dThe ’consensus string’ shows the residues found in each group on that specific site ordered by frequency were a lower case letter is present less than half the amount of the most abundant residue (upper case).

eIndividuals who developed CrNA.

fIndividuals who did not develop CrNA.

gNumbers represent the subclusters as defined in Additional file 5: Table S2.