Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 29;84:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048

Figure 15. Discussion points.

Figure 15

A) The 264–264 average correlation matrix in the adult cohorts under different processing streams. B) Histograms of the correlation values found without GSR in the adult cohorts. C) Red vectors show where negative correlations are located in (B). D) Plots of RSFC correlation values under different processing strategies. Points under the line have higher values under the processing indicated on the X axis. E) Comparison of optimal within-subject processing vs. optimal processing without GSR in high-motion adults. F) Comparison of processing with and without GSR in low-motion adults.