Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 27;13:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-439

Table 1.

Univariate analysis of the prognostic factors in the whole CRC population

 
 
OS
RFS
SAR
Factor Comparison P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI)
MSI
MSI-H vs MSS
0.0002
0.45 (0.30,0.69)
< 0.0001
0.48 (0.34,0.68)
0.9643
0.99 (0.65,1.52)
Site
Left vs Right
0.3143
0.89 (0.72,1.11)
0.2123
1.13 (0.93,1.36)
<0.0001
0.59 (0.47, 0.73)
Grade
G3,4 vs G1,2
0.0018
1.63 (1.29,2.23)
0.0012
1.56 (1.19,2.04)
0.0387
1.38 (1.01,1.88)
T stage
T3 vs T1,2
0.0634
1.76 (0.96,3.22)
0.0629
1.58 (0.97,2.58)
0.1399
1.57 (0.86,2.88)
 
T4 vs T1,2
0.0002
3.06 (1.63,5.74)
< 0.0001
2.69 (1.61,4.48)
0.0680
1.78 (0.95,3.35)
N stage
N1 vs N0
< 0.0001
1.91 (1.38,2.65)
< 0.0001
1.78 (1.36, 2.32)
0.9809
0.98 (0.71,1.35)
 
N2 vs N0
< 0.0001
4.51 (3.28,6.21)
< 0.0001
4.06 (3.11,5.29)
0.1498
1.24 (0.90,1.71)
BRAF
BRAF mut vs WT2
0.0004
1.92 (1.33,2.78)
0.0832
1.35 (0.96,1.89)
< 0.0001
2.56 (1.75,3.70)
 
BRAF mut vs BRAF wt
0.0009
1.78 (1.26,2.53)
0.1174
1.30 (0.94,1.81)
< 0.0001
2.48 (1.74,3.53)
KRAS
KRAS mut vs WT2
0.1461
1.20 (0.93,1.54)
0.4410
1.09 (0.88,1.33)
0.1755
1.18 (0.93,1.52)
  KRAS mut vs KRAS wt 0.4826 1.09 (0.86,1.37) 0.7245 1.04 (0.85,1.27) 0.7222 1.04 (0.82,1.32)