Table 2.
Results of the analysis of the data from the mate-harm assay
| Effect | SS | MS Num | DF Num | MS Den | DF Den | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selection regime |
609.96 |
304.98 |
2 |
23.41 |
4 |
13.03 |
0.018 |
| Mating status |
557.44 |
557.44 |
1 |
90.43 |
2 |
6.16 |
0.131 |
| Block |
184.46 |
92.23 |
2 |
67.24 |
1 |
1.37 |
0.525 |
| Selection regime × Mating status |
129.32 |
64.66 |
2 |
46.60 |
4 |
1.39 |
0.349 |
| Selection regime × Block |
93.60 |
23.40 |
4 |
46.61 |
4 |
0.50 |
0.740 |
| Mating status × Block |
180.89 |
90.45 |
2 |
46.61 |
4 |
1.94 |
0.258 |
| Selection regime × Mating status × Block | 186.42 | 46.61 | 4 | 45.51 | 153 | 1.02 | 0.397 |
Summary of results of three-factor ANOVA using selection regime and mating status as fixed factors crossed with random blocks on the progeny production data. Vial means were taken as the unit of analysis. p-values in bold case are statistically significant.