Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Mar 13;32(4):10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00619.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00619.x

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Models of Reasons for Drinking at Baseline Predicting New Onset Alcohol Dependence at 10 Years in 423 New Jersey Residents Without a Diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence at Baseline Conditioning Reasons for Drinking on Having a Positive Family History of Alcohol Problemsa

IOR (95% CI)
Model 1: drinking for social facilitation
  Unadjusted model:
    No family history of alcoholism reference
    Positive family history and < median 1.08 (0.51, 2.29)
    Positive family history and ≥ median 3.52 (1.89, 6.57)
  Adjusted model:
    No family history of alcoholism reference
    Positive family history and < median 1.12 (0.51, 2.47)
    Positive family history and ≥ median 4.54 (2.31, 8.93)
    Male 0.75 (0.42, 1.34)
    White 0.87 (0.41, 1.87)
    Age 0.26 (0.10, 0.66)
    Binge drinking 1.29 (1.13, 1.46)
Model 2: drinking to reduce negative affect
  Unadjusted model:
    No family history of alcoholism reference
    Positive family history and < median 0.95 (0.42, 2.15)
    Positive family history and ≥ median 3.39 (1.86, 6.20)
  Adjusted model:
    No family history of alcoholism reference
    Positive family history and < median 1.10 (0.47, 2.58)
    Positive family history and ≥ median 3.79 (2.00, 7.18)
    Male 0.82 (0.46, 1.46)
    White 0.98 (0.45, 2.10)
    Age 0.27 (0.11, 0.69)
    Binge drinking 1.26 (1.11, 1.43)
a

Having a positive family history and being below the median on the Reasons for Drinking Scale (RDS) was coded as 1 and 0 otherwise. A positive family history and being at or above the median on the RDS was coded 1 and 0 otherwise.