Table 3.
Univariate and Multivariable Models of Reasons for Drinking at Baseline Predicting New Onset Alcohol Dependence at 10 Years in 423 New Jersey Residents Without a Diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence at Baseline Conditioning Reasons for Drinking on Having a Positive Family History of Alcohol Problemsa
IOR (95% CI) | |
---|---|
Model 1: drinking for social facilitation | |
Unadjusted model: | |
No family history of alcoholism | reference |
Positive family history and < median | 1.08 (0.51, 2.29) |
Positive family history and ≥ median | 3.52 (1.89, 6.57) |
Adjusted model: | |
No family history of alcoholism | reference |
Positive family history and < median | 1.12 (0.51, 2.47) |
Positive family history and ≥ median | 4.54 (2.31, 8.93) |
Male | 0.75 (0.42, 1.34) |
White | 0.87 (0.41, 1.87) |
Age | 0.26 (0.10, 0.66) |
Binge drinking | 1.29 (1.13, 1.46) |
Model 2: drinking to reduce negative affect | |
Unadjusted model: | |
No family history of alcoholism | reference |
Positive family history and < median | 0.95 (0.42, 2.15) |
Positive family history and ≥ median | 3.39 (1.86, 6.20) |
Adjusted model: | |
No family history of alcoholism | reference |
Positive family history and < median | 1.10 (0.47, 2.58) |
Positive family history and ≥ median | 3.79 (2.00, 7.18) |
Male | 0.82 (0.46, 1.46) |
White | 0.98 (0.45, 2.10) |
Age | 0.27 (0.11, 0.69) |
Binge drinking | 1.26 (1.11, 1.43) |
Having a positive family history and being below the median on the Reasons for Drinking Scale (RDS) was coded as 1 and 0 otherwise. A positive family history and being at or above the median on the RDS was coded 1 and 0 otherwise.