Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2010 May;16(5):351–360.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Women at Initial Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosis Between 1990 and 2001a

Characteristic Race/Ethnicity, No. (%)
Black (n = 292) Hispanic (n = 263) Asian or Pacific Islander (n = 370) Non-Hispanic White (n = 2075) Total (N = 3000)
Age at diagnosis, y
 <50 81 (27.7) 84 (31.9) 139 (37.6) 457 (22.0) 761 (25.4)
 50–59 85 (29.1) 77 (29.3) 116 (31.4) 580 (28.0) 858 (28.6)
 60–69 82 (28.1) 81 (30.8) 83 (22.4) 560 (27.0) 806 (26.9)
 ≥70 44 (15.1) 21 (8.0) 32 (8.7) 478 (23.0) 575 (19.2)
P <.001
Year of diagnosis
 1990–1991 24 (8.2) 15 (5.7) 21 (5.7) 194 (9.4) 254 (8.5)
 1992–1993 35 (12.0) 24 (9.1) 27 (7.3) 264 (12.7) 350 (11.7)
 1994–1995 33 (11.3) 37 (14.1) 40 (10.8) 335 (16.1) 445 (14.8)
 1996–1997 57 (19.5) 45 (17.1) 52 (14.1) 406 (19.6) 560 (18.7)
 1998–1999 69 (23.6) 60 (22.8) 108 (29.2) 428 (20.6) 665 (22.2)
 2000–2001 74 (25.3) 82 (31.2) 122 (33.0) 448 (21.6) 726 (24.2)
P <.001
Family history of breast cancer
 Yes 53 (18.6) 48 (18.5) 41 (11.4) 393 (19.4) 535 (18.3)
 No 232 (81.4) 212 (81.5) 318 (88.6) 1633 (80.6) 2395 (81.7)
P <.001
Educationb
 ≤High school graduate 110 (48.9) 103 (45.4) 59 (19.0) 265 (17.3) 537 (23.4)
 ≥Some college 115 (51.1) 124 (54.6) 252 (81.0) 1266 (82.7) 1757 (76.6)
P <.001
Median family incomeb
 Bottom 25% 115 (51.1) 84 (36.7) 60 (19.2) 317 (20.6) 576 (25.0)
 25%–50% 56 (24.9) 59 (25.8) 72 (23.1) 389 (25.3) 576 (25.0)
 51%–75% 34 (15.1) 56 (24.5) 75 (24.0) 411 (26.8) 576 (25.0)
 Top 25% 20 (8.9) 30 (13.1) 105 (33.7) 419 (27.3) 574 (24.9)
P <.001
History of diabetes
 Yes 34 (11.7) 30 (11.4) 30 (8.1) 126 (6.1) 220 (7.4)
 No 256 (88.3) 233 (88.6) 339 (91.9) 1945 (93.9) 2773 (92.7)
P <.001
Body mass indexc
 Underweight 1 (0.4) 2 (0.8) 15 (4.5) 32 (1.7) 50 (1.9)
 Normal 43 (17.4) 64 (26.5) 192 (58.0) 777 (41.2) 1076 (39.8)
 Overweight 89 (36.0) 100 (41.3) 103 (31.1) 622 (33.0) 914 (33.8)
 Obese 114 (46.2) 76 (31.4) 21 (6.3) 456 (24.2) 667 (24.6)
 Unknown 45 (15.4) 21 (8.0) 39 (10.5) 188 (9.1) 293 (9.8)
P <.001
Method of detectiond
 Palpation 55 (19.2) 47 (17.9) 83 (22.5) 334 (16.2) 519 (17.4)
 Mammography 232 (80.8) 216 (82.1) 286 (77.5) 1729 (83.8) 2463 (82.6)
P = .02
Surgical margins, mme
 Involved 8 (11.4) 6 (10.2) 13 (12.0) 60 (8.7) 87 (9.4)
 Free, <2 17 (24.3) 6 (10.2) 17 (15.7) 134 (19.3) 174 (18.7)
 Free, 2–9 4 (5.7) 2 (3.4) 3 (2.8) 37 (5.3) 46 (5.0)
 Free, ≥10 25 (35.7) 20 (33.9) 34 (31.5) 238 (34.3) 317 (34.1)
 Free, unknown distance 16 (22.9) 25 (42.4) 41 (38.0) 224 (32.3) 306 (32.9)
P = .43
Tumor size, cme
 ≤1 23 (44.2) 29 (59.2) 43 (61.4) 316 (65.7) 411 (63.0)
 1–2 20 (38.5) 11 (22.5) 23 (32.9) 130 (27.0) 184 (28.2)
 >2 9 (17.3) 9 (18.4) 4 (5.7) 35 (7.3) 57 (8.7)
P = .005
Nuclear gradee
 Low 9 (19.2) 10 (25.0) 13 (17.8) 101 (24.9) 133 (23.5)
 Medium 18 (38.3) 13 (32.5) 30 (41.1) 136 (33.6) 197 (34.9)
 High 20 (42.6) 17 (42.5) 30 (41.1) 168 (41.5) 235 (41.6)
P = .81
Comedo histologic growth patterne
 Absent 46 (61.3) 36 (57.1) 70 (64.2) 448 (61.5) 600 (61.5)
 Present 29 (38.7) 27 (42.9) 39 (35.8) 281 (38.6) 376 (38.5)
P = .84
Necrosise
 Absent 0 1 (3.7) 3 (6.7) 19 (6.8) 23 (6.2)
 Present 21 (100.0) 26 (96.3) 42 (93.3) 260 (93.2) 349 (93.8)
P = .60
Treatment modality
 BCS with radiation therapy 113 (38.7) 108 (41.1) 160 (60.8) 869 (41.9) 1250 (41.7)
 BCS with tamoxifen 13 (4.5) 10 (3.8) 21 (8.0) 85 (4.1) 129 (4.3)
 BCS with radiation therapy and tamoxifen 25 (8.6) 38 (14.5) 51 (19.4) 223 (10.8) 337 (11.2)
 BCS alone 141 (48.3) 107 (40.7) 138 (52.5) 898 (43.3) 1284 (42.8)
P = .10

BCS indicates breast-conserving surgery.

a

P values are based on χ2 test. Unknown values were excluded in this analysis. Column totals do not add up to 3000 due to missing numbers.

b

Education and median family income represent geocoded data for California sites. Quartiles are bottom 25%, less than $44,688; 25% to 50%, $44,689 to $60,438; 51% to 75%, $60,439 to $78,361; and top 25% (>$78,361).

c

Calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Underweight is lower than 18.5; normal, 18.5 to 24.9; overweight, 25 to 29.9; and obese, 30 or higher.

d

Method of detection varied by age (χ2 = 19.20; P = .001).

e

Surgical margins and pathologic data were available for 986 patients at 1 study site only. Races/ethnicities were black, 75 patients; Hispanic, 63 patients; Asian or Pacific Islander, 110 patients; and white, 738 patients.