Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2013 Jun 23;2013:10.1109/CVPR.2013.286. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.286

Table 1.

Comparison of average segmentation performance among MRGC [6], SRCD [5], and OTGR.

Approach Precision Recall F-Measure
MRGC 0.75 0.85 0.797
SRCD 0.63 0.75 0.685
OTGR NA NA NA

Note: 1) the information above is quoted from [6]; 2) the OTGR performance is not listed due to the unavailability of the data used in [6], however, based on our experience with histological sections, simple thresholding methods typically generate less favorable results than sophisticated ones.