Table 2.
miRanda and TargetScan score parameters can predict co-expression
| Data Source | Parameter | Pearson Correlation | -log10 (P-Value) |
|---|---|---|---|
| miRanda conserved | Alignment Score | 0.041 | 69.83 |
| Conservation Score | -0.023 | 22.16 | |
| Free Energy | 0.024 | 23.33 | |
| mirSVR Score | -0.02 | 16.6 | |
| miRanda nonconserved | Alignment Score | 0.026 | 139.55 |
| Conservation Score | -0.025 | 130.38 | |
| Free Energy | -0.08 | > 307 | |
| mirSVR Score | 0.024 | 120.49 | |
| TargetScan | Aggregate PCT | 0.023 | 5.51 |
| Context Score | -0.112 | 141.13 | |
| # Conserved Sites | 0.0299 | 9.61 | |
| # Nonconserved Sites | -0.064 | 45.92 | |
| # Conserved 7mer-1a sites | 0.019 | 3.27 | |
| # Conserved 7mer-m8 sites | 0.014 | 1.39 | |
| # Conserved 8mer sites | 0.02 | 4.2 | |
| # Nonconserved 7mer-1a sites | -0.094 | 99.64 | |
| # Nonconserved 7mer-m8 sites | 0.031 | 10.64 | |
| # Nonconserved 8mer sites | -0.008 | 0 |
For each predicted miRNA-mRNA pair from the miRanda conserved, miRanda nonconserved, and TargetScan datasets, the Pearson correlation coefficient for co-expression across multiple RNA-seq experiments was obtained. The correlation coefficient was then compared to various predictor variables provided by miRanda/TargetScan, across all pairs, again using Pearson correlation. (P-values after Bonferroni correction; * indicates significance at p < 0.05; ** indicates significance at p < 0.001).